My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACH 05-06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
121515
>
18 ATTACH 05-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 11:01:40 AM
Creation date
12/9/2015 12:44:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACH 05-06
Document Relationships
18
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2015\121515
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> • Downtown Specific Plan Land Use Policies and Programs, Commercial Use, <br /> No. 1; B; C: "...three-story buildings may be allowed on a case-by-case basis. <br /> ...The building must be designed to minimize its three-story appearance.... The <br /> building must conform with the Municipal Code height limits." <br /> e Downtown Specific Plan, various sections: "...recognize that Downtown is <br /> growing and that constructing new buildings on vacant and undeveloped sites <br /> keeps the area vital and desirable." "Such new development is to be encouraged <br /> provided that it fits with the established pattern and reflects one of the various <br /> architectural styles." "New homes should face the street." "To ensure that a <br /> significant amount of parking required to serve new development is provided <br /> on- site by private property owners." <br /> Mr. Bower then made a brief presentation of the project's configuration. He stated that <br /> they were aware that the building height of the units was going to be the big concern; <br /> therefore, the three units were set back 20 feet from the street to try and minimize that <br /> height, noting that these units would seem bigger if they were up on the front of the <br /> street. He added that if they had located these units up on the street and done rear <br /> parking, they would have had to put a driveway through and would have had to shave <br /> off part of the existing house, which would have made the house even smaller and less <br /> functional than its 1,169 square feet, and would also have taken away about one-third of <br /> the plaza area. He further added that the bioswale would also have had to be relocated <br /> to the front, and there would only be two-car parking for each spot. He then presented <br /> a short video of a fly-by 3-D animation of the project. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he saw the brown fences as he went by the project <br /> site and inquired if they were doing a wood fence and if there was the possibility of <br /> doing an open, wrought iron fencing. <br /> Mr. Bowers replied that there would be a wood fence on the perimeter and between the <br /> units in the backyard, and a wrought iron fence up on the front. <br /> Eric Pestana stated that he lives across from the project site and that the empty lot has <br /> become somewhat of an eyesore and has been used for all sorts of different things. He <br /> indicated that putting a project like this would add beauty to the Downtown, with the <br /> front use of the house changing from rental to retail and the addition of a nice plaza. He <br /> added that it would beautify that end of town and that he and his wife support the <br /> project. <br /> Emil Oxsen stated that he also lives across the street from the project site. He indicated <br /> that he has no problem with the lot being developed, but his main concern is the height <br /> and he disagrees with the three stories. He noted that he had to fight to build his house: <br /> he had to construct a one story, and it had to be 1,200 square feet. He added that he <br /> did not take away any off-street or on-street parking because his driveway was already <br /> there. He inquired why the garages are not placed in the back like the houses next <br /> door. He noted that there are three or four houses right next to him that are just like <br /> that, except they are not three stories and are not 40 feet tall. He added that they are <br /> putting a residential project in a commercial zoning, which would start a precedent and <br /> create a problem going forward. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11/182015 Page 4 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.