My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
121515
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2015 12:10:05 PM
Creation date
12/9/2015 12:10:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. City-sponsored events: City events (Hometown Holidays) could have specific no <br /> smoking provisions. For example, the City of Dublin bans smoking at city- <br /> sponsored events (but has designated smoking areas). <br /> 4. Conditional use permit (CUP): Some activities are subject to a CUP (Saturday <br /> Farmers' Market). Planning staff could work with permit holders to make an <br /> administrative amendment to modify a CUP to add non-smoking provisions if <br /> desired by the permit holder. <br /> 5. Blanket ban: Livermore and Walnut Creek both ban smoking within designated <br /> downtown / pedestrian areas. <br /> 6. Enforcement: Any of these options would require `No Smoking' signage. <br /> Enforcement would include: (a) warnings by City and event staff; and (b) <br /> administrative citation ($100 fine) by police officers. <br /> The committee members led insightful discussion about their general perception that <br /> not too many customers are actively walking through the Downtown and smoking. <br /> Rather, it is often employees taking a cigarette break behind a business or in a parking <br /> lot. There was not majority support for any blanket ban (No. 5, above). There was <br /> concern that if a ban were adopted, a smoking area should be established, but that may <br /> result in a few properties bearing the brunt of the smokers congregating there. <br /> The committee, as well as the PDA's Board of Directors at its September meeting, <br /> recommended smoking restrictions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6, above. This recommendation <br /> would allow each event sponsor or permit holder to decide if their event should be <br /> smoke-free. This would also recommend a ban on smoking at City-sponsored events. <br /> The discussion at the committee meeting was that this approach would provide a good <br /> balance for a smoking ban at family-oriented events (e.g. daytime Big Draw), but still <br /> allow smoking for events catering to adults (e.g. evening Wine Stroll). <br /> Discussion about enforcement considerations (and potential public confusion if some <br /> events allow smoking, but some events ban it) resulted in an active conversation about <br /> event signage, advance advertising, a warning process, as well as enforcement. <br /> Staff supports the PDA's recommendation. <br /> To make these smoking restrictions a clear option for persons holding Downtown <br /> events, and to make enforcement possible by administrative citation, amendments are <br /> proposed to the Municipal Code Chapters 9.24 Smoking in Public and Work Places and <br /> 13.08 Parks and Recreation Facilities, as shown in Attachment 1. <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.