07 - Laserfiche WebLink

•, .r. : - F I r t. i i t C c•i'I I!I l".l∎l)rl i't:+L t :1, PHASE I AND 2 DELIVERABLES AND MEETINGS 3 Based on the traffic forecasts to be developed as part of To summarize,Fehr&Peers will submit the following the Model Development Tasks,Fehr&Peers will create major deliverables during the study: Synchro Networks for the following scenarios: 1. Monthly Task Progress Reports(with the 1 • EPAP(AM and PM peak hours) invoices) • General Plan Buildout(AM and PM peak hours) 2. Meeting agendas and minutes 3. Memo summarizing review of existing model Li Intersection levels of service and vehicle queues will be calculated.The analysis will consider adjustments in 4. Model Development Report ,_ peak hour factors,signal timing and phasing,and other 5. Draft and Final Baseline Report parameters based on the Task 1 discussion. 2 6. Updated Travel Demand Model The initial results will be compared to prior planning efforts and major changes will be discussed with City Loaded Synchro files for Existing,EPAP and staff prior to completing the analysis. General Plan Buildout CX For locations where the level of service is projected to In addition to the kick-off meeting in Task 1,Fehr& exceed the City's level of service standard or where Peers will attend up to five project meetings during the st vehicle queues are expected to spill beyond their course of this project and participate in five hour long available storage length,we will identify potential conference calls.Additional meetings can be attended with prior authorization by City staff on a time and improvements for discussion with City staff.For a budgeting purposes,we have estimated that materials basis. approximately 20 intersections would require some i,•): 1 i ," i y ; /0 RU`, 1:` 1 ili level of mitigation. _______________ ____________,_ ______ As part of this assessment,we will evaluate operations - ,1,-t of the Gateway Intersections assuming that planned Once the model is validated for the base year conditions .;,7 improvements are not implemented.It is envisioned and the future year scenarios have been developed,we that separate model runs would be conducted as not can provide plots of model output for any of the ?. completing some Gateway improvements could available scenarios.The most commonly requested task constrain capacity resulting in a diversion of traffic, is expected to be a select zone analysis.To conduct this 'I potentially resulting in secondary impacts at other task,we can modify TAZ-specific land uses,run the intersections.Our level of effort includes rerunning the model,and provide model output to the person or firm ;A model with roadway network changes,modifying the requesting the information.The cost to provide AM and intersection turning movement forecasts and reanalyzing key intersections.The budget would be PM peak hour select zone plots for Existing,EPAP and kr! General Plan Buildout is provided in the cost estimate. adjusted if this task is not necessary. • . , t 1,, Files for both the updated travel demand model and the 7 Several interim deliverables will be prepared as part of updated Synchro model will be provided to City staff. the baseline report task,including: We will provide training sessions to City staff interested r`i • Technical memorandum summarizing analysis in using the travel demand model for tasks such as parameters(Task 1) changing localized land use or road network • Technical memorandum summarizing existing assumptions and running the model to determine levels of service and queues(Task 2) resulting traffic volumes.We have budgeted fora half d • Summary of safety assessment(Task 3) day training session in either our Walnut Creek office or r.- • Technical memorandum summarizing existing the City's offices.We would discuss the City's training levels of service and queues(Task 4) goals prior to the session such that materials could be ; tailored to meet staff needs. The interim technical memorandums will be compiled . , into a Draft Baseline Report,which will include final Fehr&Peers can update the model as requested by City documentation of Tasks 1 through 4.Based on editorial of Pleasanton staff.Updates could include modifying -' comments from City staff on the draft report,we will network assumptions and changing land uses to reflect prepare a final baseline report. development as it is approved.Some modifications .d 10 LI