SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL - Laserfiche WebLink

Subject: FW: Lund II Dec 1, 2015 meeting From: Iundranchdevelopment Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 3:59 AM To: Mayor and City Council Subject: Lund II Dec 1, 2015 meeting LUND RANCH II SUPPLEMENT L MATERIAL Provided to the City Council After Distribution of Packet Date December 1s1 2015 City Council Meeting Last month, I proposed a win - win - win -win solution for all interested parties. My solution was based upon knowledge of the property, information from the EIR, and information presented during the Planning Commission workshops & hearings. During the City Council meeting of Nov. 17th, 2015, a significant amount of new information was presented. This information had never been presented at anytime during Planning Commission workshop & hearings. This new information is a game- changer. will summarize the key points. 1) A road can be constructed to connect Lund II to Sycamore Heights without traversing a 25% grade. 2) The extension of ridgelines, and the 100' corresponding setback result in the culvert being within the setback (90 95'). This structure, constructed at grade level would not be allowed if Measure PP is followed. 3) Regardless of the measurement point of a DU (Pad or roofline), most of this development falls within the 100' setback provision of Measure PP. Measurement taken at the roofline of the homes proposed would result in the proposed homes being only 70' below the ridgeline. Is a road a structure? Based upon the newly presented ridgelines, the question becomes irrelevant. While the definition of road /structure as it applies to Measure PP is moot, it has no bearing on this project with the new ridgelines. The new ridgeline and the 100' setback requirement result in a maximum development potential of 10. The City Council should not be concerned at this time with the road access /connection. The City Council should focus on determining by calculation the building envelope (x -y -z) of the property. 3 current Councilmembers are on record with previous votes stating that the measurement point should be the roofline, not the pad, when determining the 100' setback. With the culvert discussed being at a level 95' below the ridgeline, the proposed homes would be 70' below the ridgeline, and would not be in compliance of Measure PP's 100' setback requirement. John Bauer South Pleasanton Resident Click here to report this email as spam. 1