Laserfiche WebLink
Subject: <br />FW: Sycamore Heights: Proposed AlternativesTo E e eelImtinsnet-rf�f i_otal e aLnce of <br />Common Area) Provided to the City Council <br />After Distribution of Packet <br />Date <br />From: Jennifer Lucas [mailto:jlucas@a Hughes- Gill.com] <br />Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 9:30 PM <br />To: dcasarez©vierramoore.com <br />Cc: Mike Hughes <br />Subject: Sycamore Heights: Proposed Alternative To Development <br />r <br />Dear Board Members: <br />of Lot D (Conveyance of Common Area) <br />We understand that the Association is concerned about plans to develop nearby property, and specifically about the <br />City's intention to provide access to the newly developed property by extension of Sunset Creek Lane. We have been <br />asked to provide an opinion regarding the feasibility of an alternative concept that is (as we understand it) being <br />considered by the City after discussions with a Board member, whereby the Association would convey a portion of <br />Common Area Lot A (the Association's open space Lot at the end of McCutchan Court) to the City for construction of a <br />road to provide ingress /egress to the new development. <br />In order to provide this opinion, we reviewed the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Sycamore <br />Heights, recorded in Alameda County on December 31, 2003 as Doc. No. 2003746702 ( "CC &Rs "), and the Bylaws of <br />Sycamore Heights Owners Association, certified on 04/14/2003 ( "Bylaws "). <br />In short, our opinion is that while the Board is authorized to convey Common Area, the proposed use (a public road) of <br />Lot A is prohibited by the CC &Rs. Accordingly, even if the Association did convey a portion of Lot A to the City, no road <br />could be constructed in that location. While it might be possible to revise various documents to circumvent this <br />restriction, efforts to do so would be time - consuming, costly, and complicated. <br />1. The Board Has The Authority To Convey Common Area <br />Pursuant to section 7.5 of the CC &Rs: <br />... the Board shall have the power and right in the name of the Association and all of the Owners as <br />their attorneys -in -fact to grant, convey, dedicate, mortgage or otherwise transfer to any Owner or <br />other person or entity, fee title, easements, exclusive use easements, security rights or other rights or <br />licenses in, over, or under the Common Area that, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the best <br />interests of the Association and its Members. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no <br />event shall the Board take any action authorized hereunder that would permanently and <br />unreasonably interfere with the use, occupancy and enjoyment by any Owner of that Owner's Lot <br />without prior written consent of that Owner. <br />Accordingly, the Board may, under certain circumstances, convey Common Area such as Lot A (or any portion thereof). <br />Although it is questionable whether the traffic increase on McCutchan Court resulting from the relocation of the <br />proposed street would constitute an "unreasonable" interference with the affected Lot Owners' use, occupancy and <br />enjoyment of their Lots, prior to any conveyance, the Board should obtain written consent of those Owners in order to <br />ensure compliance with the last sentence of section 7.5. <br />One possible impediment to the ability of the Board to convey common area is presented by Section 3.3.2 of the Bylaws, <br />which requires a member vote to "sell property of the Association having an aggregate fair market value greater than <br />1 <br />