My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 11:23:22 AM
Creation date
10/28/2015 11:23:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISCUSSION <br /> In January 2015, the Veterans group presented a revised design to the City that <br /> included the following description and design elements: <br /> Memorial Description <br /> The Veterans group is interested in having a memorial at the cemetery due to the <br /> serenity of the location. The memorial is designed to recognize the sacrifices of those <br /> that served. Design elements include: <br /> • Seven (7) monoliths <br /> • Seven (7) 25-foot tall flag poles and eight (8) flags - including the American Flag, <br /> POW/MIA Flag and flags representing all of the six (6) military branches <br /> • Large center granite platform <br /> • Two (2) entrance kiosks <br /> • One (1) bronze sculpture of a solider kneeling <br /> • Six (6) benches <br /> • Six (6) service branch inserts <br /> • One (1) red granite star <br /> DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS <br /> Public Art Selection Sub-committee <br /> The design was shared with the Public Art Selection Sub-committee (PASS) at their <br /> meeting on May 15, 2015. At the PASS meeting, the Veterans group shared their <br /> proposed design with the committee at the Pioneer Cemetery and was able to articulate <br /> why the elements and location site were chosen (Attachment 3). <br /> The PASS members were able to ask specific questions to the representatives and <br /> share initial feedback. At the conclusion of the meeting, the PASS members shared the <br /> following feedback with staff regarding the proposed design: <br /> PASS Feedback: <br /> • PASS members supported the idea of the memorial <br /> • The scale of the piece in reference to the size of the area is very important — <br /> PASS members feel the piece, as proposed, was too grand/large for the area <br /> • PASS members were not in favor of the star design on the ground and <br /> recommended extending the shape of the base granite piece instead of creating <br /> the star underneath the base <br /> • PASS members recommend against the flag poles being permanently placed at <br /> the cemetery. They are concerned the poles are too tall and would overwhelm <br /> the area <br /> • PASS members want to assure all appropriate names of the fallen on the granite <br /> are mentioned and spelled correctly <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.