My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
conservation element caused this project to shrink; hillside preservation was <br /> accomplished through the Initiative, but the unintended consequences are what the <br /> Commission is grappling with today. He noted that this is a very minor road, not the <br /> Hayward Hotel road; a road with less grading than Bernal Avenue and very much less <br /> visible than Bernal Avenue going up the side of the hill and over. <br /> Commissioner Nagler stated that there are still 550 average trips a day; there is still <br /> traffic, and the question still remains where that traffic should go. <br /> On that note, Commissioner Balch questioned why staff Option 3 versus the EIR <br /> Option 3 is the way to go. <br /> Commissioner Nagler replied that it is the possibility of cut-through, because if one end <br /> of the neighborhood is connected and the exit is on the other end, the whole cut-through <br /> issue could be exacerbated. <br /> Chair Allen stated that it is a long way around. She added that at the last meeting, the <br /> Commission talked a little bit more about volumes, and Mr. Tassano hypothesized that <br /> the volumes would be roughly two to three times as many cars if the road were allowed <br /> to be open. <br /> Mr. Tassano agreed that it does seem like it is a long way around, but staff has watched <br /> a lot of different long-way-around routes go, and it is a valid concern. He indicated that <br /> he does not usually bring up concerns if they are minor, but it concerns him that people <br /> would take that Junipero Street/Independence Drive route. He noted that 150 vehicles <br /> go there every morning that cut through, and they are just going to school. He was his <br /> concerned that if it is connected, then it would provide that cut-through option. He <br /> added that it is not certain either if Junipero Street and Independence Drive are going to <br /> get 20 percent or 80 percent of the traffic, if they are all going to go to Raley's and take <br /> that other route. He concluded that the final routing would be a little bit more of the <br /> unknown, and it is more of a 50/50 split. <br /> Commissioner Nagler inquired if the facts changed the positions. <br /> Chair Allen replied that they did not change for her. <br /> Commissioner Piper stated that it did not change for her either. <br /> Chair Allen called for a break at 10:20 p.m. and thereafter reconvened the meeting at <br /> 10:28 p.m. <br /> Commissioner Balch suggested that the Commission go through the conditions and the <br /> other elements before making a motion. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that the Commissioners may want to decide on the three options first <br /> as the Commission does not yet have an agreement on the basic vote. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 38 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.