My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:37:15 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:36:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
more restrictive the methodology, which seemed inconsistent with the purposes <br /> of Measure PP and common sense. The methodology was also difficult to <br /> implement because it was not clear which point on the ridgeline a proposed <br /> homesite was intended to be measured from, as the elevation of the ridgeline <br /> varies from point to point. In reconsidering the methodology, staff created a <br /> setback line that extends 100 vertical feet downward from the identified ridgeline <br /> and then turns 90 degrees to daylight. The placement of residential or <br /> commercial structures would be prohibited on the hillsides above this setback <br /> line. This methodology protects the ridgelines and the hillsides near the <br /> ridgelines from development but does not penalize proposed homes on low flat <br /> lands that would be near small ridges that have low or no visibility from <br /> surrounding areas. This methodology also avoids the debate about measuring <br /> distance from the ridgeline to a pad or to the top of a residential structure. <br /> Figure 4, on the following page, illustrates this concept. The Planning <br /> Commission was supportive of this methodology. <br /> Page 11 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.