My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:37:15 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:36:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The interpretation of these areas relative to the Lund Ranch II property would affect its <br /> site design, number of lots, and potential street connections to adjacent neighborhoods. <br /> 1. Measuring Slope <br /> Staff defined slope as the ratio of rise (height) over run (distance). A 25-percent <br /> slope' is the ratio of 1 unit of height over 4 units of distance. Staff also defines <br /> the 25-percent slope as a nominal value and not as an average value, since an <br /> average value would enable development to be located on hillsides greater than <br /> a 25-percent slope. <br /> 2. Identifying Ridges and Their End-Points <br /> Identifying what constitutes a ridge is an important part of interpreting <br /> Measure PP. While the Municipal Code provides a broad definition2, that <br /> definition is subject to different interpretations and does not distinguish between <br /> other landforms such as hills, knolls, and bluffs that we find in Pleasanton's <br /> landscape. The definition also does not distinguish between major or minor <br /> ridges or small ridge-like landforms that are inconsequential relative to the stated <br /> purposes of Measure PP. Staff has identified the ridges on and surrounding the <br /> Lund Ranch property, as shown on the Slope Map prepared by RJA Engineers <br /> Planners Surveyors, dated September 15, 2011 (Attachment 7, Sheet 4 of 6), <br /> using our best judgment in applying the definition in the Municipal Code while <br /> considering the purposes of Measure PP. Also important to the application of <br /> Measure PP is determining where a ridgeline ends. This is important if you have <br /> identified a ridgeline that runs perpendicular to a proposed development area as <br /> opposed to parallel to the area. If the end of the ridgelines are not determined, <br /> then the ridge continues all the way to the flat land, and because of the 100-foot <br /> vertical setback requirement, nothing could be developed on any property <br /> containing or near a ridge. Staff believes that a reasonable end of a ridgeline <br /> definition is "the point where the ridgeline no longer rises in elevation." The <br /> Planning Commission was supportive of this methodology. <br /> The only other definition for the end of a ridgeline that has been suggested <br /> throughout the City's long discussion of Measure PP, is the point at which the <br /> ridge elevation drops to within 100 vertical feet of adjacent flat land. Use of this <br /> definition would not substantially affect project compliance with Measure PP. <br /> 3. Vertical Setback from the Ridgeline <br /> During the extended review of the project with the Planning Commission, staff <br /> reconsidered its previously proposed methodology for implementing the required <br /> restriction on development 100 vertical feet from the ridgeline. The previous <br /> methodology was unsatisfactory because it inherently penalized homes that were <br /> proposed adjacent to, but not on, very small ridges. The lower the ridge, the <br /> A 25- percent slope is equal to a 14-degree angle. <br /> 2 A"ridge" and "ridgeline" are the topographic high points of property connected by a continuous line <br /> flanked on both sides by relatively steep slopes. For the purpose of applying Measure PP to hillside <br /> properties, staff ended the ridgeline at the peaks and similar highpoints on the Lund Ranch II property. <br /> Page 10 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.