My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
081815
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2015 12:19:40 PM
Creation date
8/12/2015 2:19:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/18/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
05
Document Relationships
05 ATTACHMENT 2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2015\081815
05 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2015\081815
05 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2015\081815
Link Groups
Link
1:
05
Last modified:
8/14/2015 12:19:40 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2015\081815
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not factored into these calculations since recycled water will be used for water features and <br /> landscaping. <br /> Based on the characteristics outlined in this section, staff finds that the impact and City <br /> infrastructure and traffic will be less than the original project and finds that the Growth <br /> Management Agreement is still valid. <br /> PUD FINDINGS <br /> Please refer to pages 12-14 of the attached Planning Commission staff report for a <br /> discussion of the considerations needed to approve the subject application. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice of the proposed project and related City Council meeting was sent to all property <br /> owners in Pleasanton that are within 1,000 feet of the Stoneridge Creek properties (the <br /> noticing area is depicted on the noticing maps attached to this report as Attachment 4, <br /> Exhibit D), and was also published in the local newspaper. Staff has not received any <br /> comments as of the publication of this report, and will forward to the City Council any public <br /> comments received after publication of this report. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> On August 24, 2010, the City Council certified a SEIR and adopted the CEQA Findings and <br /> a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan <br /> Amendment/Staples Ranch. This SEIR was a supplement to the EIR prepared for the <br /> Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment/Staples Ranch Project, which was certified on <br /> February 24, 2009. <br /> The proposed project is within the development envelope analyzed in the EIR and SEIR <br /> and therefore no further environmental documentation is required. The SEIR included <br /> some mitigation measures that needed to be addressed prior to issuance of a building <br /> permit for a project (e.g., noise analysis). These mitigation measures have been <br /> addressed in the draft conditions of approval for this project. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> The subject project would modify the previously-approved development of the northern 10 <br /> acres of the Stoneridge Creek property. Staff finds the proposed modifications to be an <br /> improvement over the prior approval, primarily because the scale and mass of the project <br /> would be reduced, and most parking would be accommodated in a sub-grade parking <br /> garage. Additionally, staff finds the project consistent with the General Plan, the <br /> Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment/Staples Ranch, and the Planned Unit <br /> Development — High Density Residential/Commercial zoning designation for the site. The <br /> project would allow additional housing opportunities for people over the age of 60 in <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> Page 8 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.