My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060215
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
CCMIN060215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2015 3:12:45 PM
Creation date
7/29/2015 3:12:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/2/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
projected to increase 6.7%. A considerable portion of Property Tax revenue increases relate to the 2% increase <br /> from Proposition 8 reversals, which are expected to disappear in FY 2017-18. <br /> General Fund expenditures are comprised of Police (27%) and Fire (16%), followed by General Government, <br /> Community Development and Community Services. Expenditure categories include Personnel at 75% followed by <br /> Materials and Supplies which includes contractual services, Repairs and Maintenance, Transportation and <br /> Training. Personnel costs are dominated by salaries ($44.2 million) followed by CaIPERS, Other Postemployment <br /> Benefits (OPEB), other medical benefits and miscellaneous expenses. Total General Fund expenditures are <br /> projected to increase 4.8% in FY 2015-16 and another 3.6% in FY 2016-17. Part of this relates to wage increases <br /> in the Pleasanton Police Officers Association and Fire MOUs and the anticipation of a new MOU for <br /> miscellaneous labor in FY 2015-16. CaIPERS employer contribution rates continue to increase an estimated <br /> 1.6%-2.2% ($613,000) in FY 2015-16 and 1.7%-3% ($1.3 million) in FY 2016-17, although medical insurance <br /> premiums are projected to decrease 2% in FY 2015-16. Staff is recommending restoring 7 new positions <br /> throughout the city, while eliminating 3 limited-term positions, for a net of 4 new positions in the next budget year. <br /> Staff has already recommended an increase of$215,000 to the Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department Worker's <br /> Compensation Reserve. <br /> Councilmember Narum asked if the Worker's Compensation Reserve is in line with what one would expect based <br /> on the number of employees. <br /> Ms. Olson candidly stated that the reserve does need to be even better funded but explained that this is what they <br /> could agree to with the City of Livermore. In closing out the FY 2014-15 Budget, both cities will come together to <br /> identify how much more needs to be put into that reserve to fully fund worker's compensation expenses. <br /> Ms. Olson continued her presentation, briefly reviewing the non-personnel expenses which comprise <br /> approximately 25% of General Fund expenditures. She noted a transfer of approximately $4.5 million to the <br /> Repair and Replacement Fund, which increases that allocation to prerecession levels. She stressed that the non- <br /> personnel side of the budget has remained fairly constant, with relatively small increases to account for increased <br /> insurance premiums and anticipated MOU negotiations, and noted that many departments have actually <br /> managed to reduce expenditures. <br /> Overall, staff is projecting an additional $2.9 million operating surplus for FY 2014-15 over what was projected at <br /> mid-year. FY 2015-16 anticipates a $3 million operating surplus followed by a similar surplus of$3.5 million in FY <br /> 2016-17, for a net projected surplus of almost $9.5 million. As Mr. Fialho indicated earlier staff is recommending <br /> the prefunding of a portion of the city's CaIPERS ($4 million) and OPEB ($1.2 million) obligations as well as <br /> directing some of the surplus towards capital ($3.3 million)and reserves ($1 million). <br /> With regards to prefunding, Ms. Olson explained that the city's Retiree Medical Reserve currently contains about <br /> $25.7 million with the city's investments on those reserves earning approximately 0.6%. CaIPERS California <br /> Employers' Retiree Benefit OPEB Trust has been earning between 1.8% and 18.4% over the past 3 years, with a <br /> 5-year blended average rate of return of 3% and 30-year rate of return of 9.4%. In looking at the city's eaming <br /> potential versus the CaIPERS', CaIPERS is clearly the winner even at its absolute worst. The combined unfunded <br /> liability, excluding the city's share for LPFD, totals $157.7 million and the Council has adopted the goal to reduce <br /> that by 10% by June 30, 2018. $102.4 million of that is paid on a 30-year amortization schedule at 7.5%while the <br /> OPEB portion of$55.3 million is paid through FY 2037-38 at 7.61%. Staff is proposing to use $12.5 million from <br /> the Retiree Medical Reserve and $4.4 million of the budget surpluses for a total contribution of $16.9 million, <br /> which would save the city $37.9 million over 30 years. The annual savings of approximately $1.5 million in <br /> reduced payments would then be allocated to the CIP to address infrastructure and facility expansion needs. If <br /> supported by the Council, staff will prepare an item for the June 16, 2015 meeting to appropriate these funds and <br /> send to CaIPERS, which has indicated that the city will receive credit in the FY 2015-16 budget if paid by June <br /> 30th. <br /> Ms. Olson briefly reviewed General Fund reserves. This includes the 10% Reserve for Economic Uncertainty <br /> which is proposed to increase both years of the budget as well as Operating Reserves, for a combined reserve <br /> total of$17.5 million or 17% of the operating budget. <br /> Ms. Olson provided a concise summary of the city's remaining funds. Water Fund revenues are expected to <br /> decrease by 2.8% in FY 2015-16 due to water reductions followed by an increase the following year due to Zone <br /> 7 rate increases. Expenses are similarly expected to decrease 3.5% the first year due to reduced consumption <br /> City Council Minutes Page 11 of 15 June 2,2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.