03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Thome stated that some new information has come to light since the last meeting which has likely changed the opinions of some regarding moving forward with a ballot measure. Specifically, as special elections item the measure would cost approximately $500,000 to place on the ballot. He requested a show of hands from those in the audience who would agree that such an expense cannot be justified at this time. He said the message has been clear from both the Council and public that there is support to pause or halt the EIR and planning process. He suggested that the Council direct staff to return with a resolution halting both processes until there is verification from both the state and Zone 7 that the drought is over, at which point the Council can reengage the community on whether or not to resume the process. He acknowledged that the drought was not the only concem expressed but reminded the public that the time for discussion on issues such as traffic and schools is through the EIR process. He suggested that during this pause, should the Council decide to move in that direction, the landowners and developers think about further outside of the box to identify development opportunities that have a less significant impact on resources. He thought this could include age - restricted housing communities which generally have no impact on schools, less of an impact on peak traffic conditions, increase local spending and would still set something aside for future housing needs allocations. Vice Mayor Brown noted that this was presented at the last meeting as Option 3. She asked if tonight's agenda item is broad enough to allow the Council to select that option now. Ms. Seto explained that tonight's agenda item relates to the consideration of a resolution calling for an election. She advised that in order to ensure the appropriate public notice and participation, staff would need to agendize and notice consideration of the types of resolutions considered at the last meeting. City Manager Fialho asked that, should the Council wish to move in that direction, they provide some guidance as to what exactly the resolution should state. Vice Mayor Brown asked if continuing the discussion to the June 16, 2015 meeting would preclude the Council from ultimately electing to place this on the November ballot. Ms. Seto explained that the timing would be close, although doable, provided the Council direction was to agendize consideration of the various resolution options and potentially the calling of an election. Mayor Thorne opened the item for public comment Arne Olson asked that the Council not waste its time with considering tonight's recommended actions. Apart from the obvious cost of a special election, he felt it was the Council's responsibility to determine whether or not to proceed with or halt the planning process just as it was when the process was begun. He supporting Councilmember Pentin's opposing vote at the last meeting and reminded the Council that 3 of its members supported the planning process during the last election. He said that this has become a divisive issue for the community due to the drought as well as the uncertainty of the next Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) cycle. He felt the process should stop until this uncertainty is reduced. At that time, the Council can use the work of the Task Force and Draft EIR to help select the best plan for the east side. If a plan is selected, then voters should be given a chance to weigh in. Scott Raty, Chamber of Commerce recommended that the Council rescind its prior action calling for an election. He also recommended that the community look at long -term water availability rather than the immediate crisis of the drought. Recent efforts by the city to secure a more sustainable water supply will help to provide certainty to the uncertain question of water availability. He noted that certain factors affecting the other issues identified, such as new Measure BB monies that might be used for the El Charro extension, will become much clearer over the next 12 to 18 months and provide the community with the information it needs to make a more informed decision. He said that the Chamber supports halting the process at this time and revisiting it only when a greater clarity is reached on all those uncertainties that have been identified. He also urged the Council to consider the appropriate time to City Council Minutes Page 4 of 18 June 2, 2015