Laserfiche WebLink
on all lodging businesses with 35 or more rooms and located within the 5 Tri-Valley cities. At the <br /> present assessment rate the TBID typically generates around $1.5 million annually. <br /> In anticipation of the district's renewal, a petition drive was circulated to all respective lodging properties <br /> in the TBID area. 85% of the 3,223 total rooms represented approved and supported the renewal of the <br /> district with the following criteria: <br /> • The district would include all lodging businesses within the district boundaries, with no minimum <br /> room quantity. <br /> • The district boundaries include the Cities of Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton, the Town of <br /> Danville, and identified unincoporated areas of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. <br /> • The assessment would remain at $2 per occupied room night for years one and two, with an <br /> allowable increase starting in year three and a maximum assessment of$3. <br /> • The renewal term would be 7 years, expiring June 30, 2022. <br /> • The City of Pleasanton would remain as administrator of the district, which is anticipated to <br /> generate approximately $1.8 million annually (at the maximum assessment) for use by Visit Tri- <br /> Valley to promote and market tourism and lodging businesses in the district area. <br /> Ms. Ott stated that all participating agencies have adopted resolutions granting consent to the City of <br /> Pleasanton to renew the district. At its April 21, 2015 meeting, the city held its first of two public <br /> hearings on the item. Tonight is the second or final public hearing. Should the city elect to renew the <br /> district, the Council will introduce an ordinance to update the city's Municipal Code. The second reading <br /> would then be scheduled as a Consent Calendar item on May 19, 2015. Tonight's requested action <br /> include the adoption of a resolution modifying the Management District Plan, introduction of an <br /> ordinance amending certain sections of Chapter 5.36 of the Municipal Code and approval of an <br /> agreement with Visit Tri-Valley and the City of Pleasanton to administer the district. <br /> A notice was sent on February 18, 2015 to all lodging businesses anticipated to be within the renewed <br /> district. In that time, the only input, comment or protest received was one protest by The Rose Hotel <br /> which the Council heard at its April 21s' public hearing. Staff spoke with the owner of The Rose Hotel, <br /> who also happens to own two other lodging properties within the district, and he has indicated an <br /> understanding of and support for the renewal of the district. <br /> Ms. Ott briefly reviewed the proposed amendments, noting that the Management District Plan has be <br /> amended to include clarifying language that vacation rentals are not included as part of the district. <br /> Changes to 5.36 of the Municipal Code are largely related to the district boundaries, including the <br /> removal of San Ramon from all language, the term of the district and the change in the assessment <br /> amount. <br /> Councilmember Pentin asked if Airbnb-type rentals are considered vacation rentals. <br /> John Lambeth, Civitas, explained that Airbnb-type accommodations would be excluded under the <br /> current terminology although these types of rentals certainly raise the broader issue of TOT collections <br /> for the city. <br /> Vice Mayor Brown recalled that 9 out 13 Pleasanton hotels support the district renewal. She asked if <br /> staff had any information regarding those who did not support the renewal. <br /> Ms. Ott explained that Barbara Steinfeld of Visit Tri-Valley made an effort to speak with each of these <br /> hotels individually. In some instances, these businesses were new to the district due to removing the <br /> room threshold and there seemed to be some uncertainty on their part about what the district really <br /> involved. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 13 May 5,2015 <br />