My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property lines would be preserved. Overall, the proposed development would <br /> remove 62 existing trees. <br /> o Landscaping. Preliminary landscape plans have been provided for the proposed <br /> development. The plan includes a six-foot precast concrete wall with grapestake <br /> textured finish along the southern property line. Climbing vines and evergreen <br /> screen trees would be planted on the north side (project side) of the wall. A <br /> variety of trees, shrubs, and groundcover are proposed throughout the project. <br /> o Vesting Tentative Map. The applicant intends to subdivide the 5.9-acre site into <br /> a total of 18 parcels: 16 parcels for 16 buildings, Lot A for the proposed tot lot, <br /> and Lot B for the remaining areas (streets, alleys, common areas, landscaping, <br /> etc.). The Vesting Tentative Map will be subject to Planning Commission review <br /> and approval following action on the proposed PUD Development Plan. <br /> Exceptions Requested by Applicant <br /> As described on pages 12-13 of the attached Planning Commission staff report, the <br /> applicant is requesting four exceptions to the Standards: 1) Front Yard Setback for <br /> Buildings 9 and 16; 2) Building Orientation for Building 12; 3) Building Separation for <br /> Buildings 4 through 7; and 4) Planter Strips at Buildings 9 and Building 16. Staff and <br /> the Planning Commission support the requested exceptions because they would not <br /> compromise the design quality of the proposed project. <br /> Affordable Housing Agreement <br /> The Housing Commission, at its April 16, 2015, meeting, reviewed affordable housing <br /> options to identify an Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) for the project. The <br /> Housing Commission unanimously recommended the approval of the AHA to the City <br /> Council. <br /> The Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO) requires all new multi-family residential <br /> projects of 15 units or more to provide at least 15 percent of the project's dwelling units <br /> at prices that are affordable to very low, low, and/or moderate income households. The <br /> proposed development of 94 multi-family units would require 14 affordable units. For <br /> this development, the applicant offered and staff accepted that the percentage of <br /> affordability would be based on the 20% requirement set forth in the IZO for a single- <br /> family residential project. As agreed between the applicant and staff, the applicant will <br /> provide 10 units and pay the City's Lower Income Housing Fee (LIHF), for a total fee of <br /> $122,452, to fulfill the IZO requirements. <br /> Amendment to the Development Agreement. <br /> In March 2014, the City Council approved a 10-year term Development Agreement for <br /> the previously-proposed 177-unit apartment project. The terms of the Development <br /> Agreement would expire in 10 years. The applicant requests an amendment to the <br /> previously approved Development Agreement to reflect the current proposal. The <br /> amendment to the previously approved Development Agreement is attached as <br /> Attachment 5. <br /> Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.