My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:05 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:14:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The attached table describes each of the recommendations and provides a status update on <br /> implementation. <br /> In our meetings with the Chamber Economic Development and Government Relations <br /> Committee (EDGR), many of which are also EVC members, we discussed some of the <br /> remaining CSRT recommendations that have not been fully implemented. These include: <br /> 1. Complete Zoning Code Update with special attention to which uses require Use Permits <br /> and which could be allowed by right with specific regulations. <br /> 2. Change Municipal Code to allow simultaneous processing of PUDS and Tentative <br /> Maps. <br /> 3. Provide a database of Conditions of Approval and allowed uses in all adopted PUDs. <br /> 4. Incorporate opportunities for fees determination into handouts and work flows to avoid <br /> surprises later in process for inexperienced applicants. <br /> 5. Incorporate determination of necessary special studies early in review process to avoid <br /> delays and unanticipated expenses for applicants. <br /> 6. Incorporate the existing thresholds for when a traffic study is required, and procedures <br /> for preparing Traffic Studies into application handout materials and preliminary <br /> discussions with applicants. <br /> 7. Continue to improve on eliminating piece-meal comments on projects from all divisions <br /> and functions. <br /> 8. Provide handouts for Engineering review processes. <br /> Staff believes that all of these additional improvement measures are reasonable and <br /> achievable. The only two highly labor intensive items in the list above are the zoning code <br /> update which can be accomplished in-house when adequate band-width becomes available <br /> after the East Pleasanton Specific Plan is completed or stopped, and the data-base for PUD <br /> conditions and allowed uses which would likely require the hiring of a planning intern. <br /> Upon reviewing the attached, please let me know if you have any questions. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Attachment: Update on Status of CSRT Recommendations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.