My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:05 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:14:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 1 <br /> THE CITY OF \ <br /> 111 <br /> pLE ASANTONC <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> Date: May 8, 2015 <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Nelson Fialho, City Manager <br /> Subject: Response to Questions about Proposed Fee Increases-Status of Implementation <br /> of Customer Service Review Team Recommendations. <br /> As you may recall, staff committed to reaching out to the Chamber of Commerce and the <br /> Economic Vitality Committee in advance of bringing the proposed Development Fee <br /> adjustments back to the City Council. Staff has nearly completed outreach meetings and <br /> would like to share some of the feedback with the Council in advance of the formal hearing. <br /> There was some acknowledgement by the Chamber members that the update to the fees was <br /> reasonable considering the length of time since they were last raised and the proposed <br /> amounts relative to neighboring or comparable cities. However, there is also some <br /> philosophical opposition to the idea that the City needs to achieve 100% cost recovery for <br /> development services fees as some individuals believe that the development generates ample <br /> income for the city through future property taxes, employment, additional spending, etc. Some <br /> participants also expressed the opinion that the high cost of fees in California was a detriment <br /> to economic development throughout the state. <br /> One of the specific topics we were asked about was the status of the Customer Service <br /> Review Team (CSRT) recommendations that were formulated in 2007 and 2008. The <br /> Customer Service Review Team was assembled by the City Manager and included a group of <br /> 14 stakeholders from the Community who had some involvement with the development <br /> community. In collaboration with a team of City staff members, the CSRT generated over 40 <br /> recommendations intended to streamline the permit review processes in planning, building <br /> plan checking and inspection, engineering review of private development and inspection, and <br /> fire plan check and inspection services. The majority of these recommendations have been <br /> completed including such major items as the creation of the Community Development <br /> Department, establishing turnaround goals for processing applications, implementing a permit <br /> tracking system, the redesigning of the Permit Center, and the hiring of a Permit Center <br /> Manager. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.