Laserfiche WebLink
• Adding more and more people diminishes the quality of life for the community <br /> • Just because the plan doesn't pencil out for the developer doesn't mean the interests of the City <br /> shouldn't be considered <br /> • The plan has no benefits and will overcrowd schools and only encourage traffic from Dublin,San <br /> Ramon, and I-580 <br /> OT -[ ER <br /> • What is the interest of Alameda County in the land within the plan area? Could it be annexed to the <br /> City of Livermore? <br /> • 1,300 homes is a large development in Pleasanton. What is the break-even point for the developers? <br /> • Zone 7 representative is not present at these meetings. Zone 7 doesn't want trails,people, or <br /> recreation space adjacent to their properties. <br /> • What is background and history of plan? What processes led the Task Force to the current point? <br /> • The City doesn't have to follow the General Plan in doing the plan <br /> • The plan is in the airport zone <br /> • Scenic trail around lake is trouble ?; <br /> • A trail between lakes will result in children drowning 3n <br /> • How will wastewater be addressed? f2 <br /> • Pleasanton should be a leader and require green homes and gray water collection tip' <br /> • Who are developers and land owners? Did the City seek them or vice versa? <br /> • One of the properties in the plan area appears to be for sale <br /> r• This project has been going on for more than 2 years. Who has the final say? <br /> • The citizens need to be part of process of developing plan <br /> • Notices of the plan should be posted on telephone poles <br /> • Plan should take into account hospitals, doctors, lines at grocery stores,parking at BART <br /> • Quality of life for long-time residents has eroded through the years as Pleasanton has grown <br /> • Hiking trails and parks near lakes will be dangerous <br /> • Strong opposition to plan �. <br /> • fake the concerns identified at these meetings as an opportunity and shelf the plan <br /> • Elected officials need to represent citizens <br /> • School enrollment and traffic models can be manipulated to derive whatever conclusions are desired <br /> • City Council appointed EPSP Task Force members 3 years ago and it consists of peers of residents, <br /> who have met over 20 times in meetings open to the public and have incorporated reports done by <br /> experts into their recommendations <br /> • The planning process should be respected <br /> • The current zoning is not what people want and residents won't want the State to tell the City what <br /> to build <br /> • BART'parking lots are full at 6:30 a.m. <br /> • Development should have short walking distance to amenities and be designed "green"with roof-top <br /> gardens and gray water systems <br /> • According to Census data, the percentage of people working and living in Pleasanton is declining: in <br /> 1990 it was 26%,in 2000 it was 19.8%, and in 2010 it was 15.4% <br /> 7 <br />