My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
051915
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:12:50 PM
Creation date
5/13/2015 11:30:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TRAFFIC <br /> • Need solution to Santa Rita Road and Valley Avenue intersection <br /> • Traffic congestion at First Street and Sunol Boulevard has not been addressed <br /> • Extension of El Charro Road will result in cut through traffic from San Ramon and Dublin <br /> • Need to realize absolute traffic impacts when factoring in other construction in Pleasanton,including <br /> multi-family units approved or to be built in future <br /> • Will El Charro Road only be constructed if the EPSP is approved? <br /> • Will BART to Livermore be constructed? <br /> i41 • El Charro Road will be a regional road—can we secure funding to construct it without depending on <br /> plan developers? <br /> • How can we fix I-680 south? <br /> • Traffic roundabouts work letter than lights and should be considered at Santa Rita Road and Valley <br /> Avenue <br /> 2 • El Charro Road is not expected to make traffic better <br /> • Who pays for El Charro Road? <br /> • Does not make sense to build 1,300 homes, especially with the gravel trucks that currently use <br /> vit Stanley Boulevard <br /> • The plan would add 29,000 vehicle trips. Not all will use El Charro Road, so where will the rest go? <br /> Ism • Pleasanton is great for cut through traffic for people from Dublin,Livermore, and the Central Valley <br /> UJ <br /> to get to I-680 and avoid using Route 84. Traffic study should evaluate cut-through traffic from <br /> g surrounding communities <br /> • Doubtful that a road can be constructed through lakes,especially since they hold flood water <br /> MC) • Major cross-through traffic exists on Stanley Boulevard in mornings and evenings. This project <br /> Mwould dump additional traffic in worst spot <br /> • How much regional funding will the project receive? <br /> hco • Why does the traffic report only look at PM trips? <br /> ti • First Street is at its capacity. This project will make congestion worse <br /> • How many people work in Hacienda Business Park that live in Tracy or Livermore? <br /> t2 • Traffic enforcement needs to be better. The City and Alameda County need to work together on <br /> this. <br /> • I-Ias the planned water park in Dublin been factored into the traffic analysis? <br /> • Not a good idea to run a road through the middle of a water reservoir <br /> • Is it possible to make El Charro Road a toll road? <br /> • The traffic study uses data from March and November 2013. This is old data and should be updated <br /> • Traffic on First Street is already bad and El Charro Road is not going to help First Street <br /> • The approximate 1.5 million square feet of industrial space may not have a high number of people, <br /> but will have significant truck traffic <br /> • The plan is seriously flawed because it is contingent on El Charro Road <br /> • The fill and pillars required for construction of El Charro Road will result in only one car in each <br /> direction <br /> • Concern about cars veering off of El Charro Road into the lakes <br /> WATER SUPPLY <br /> • No way to add homes with water shortage <br /> • Plan should address gray water system pumps and storage <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.