My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
051915
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:12:50 PM
Creation date
5/13/2015 11:30:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAND USE <br /> • The proposed retail site is outside plan area for services; the center should be neighborhood sewing <br /> • The plan should include a school and athletic park (for cricket,lacrosse, and other sports) <br /> • Put in a sports field on the Ktewit property since kids shouldn't be digging in the bad soil on that site <br /> SC -{ OOLS <br /> • Demographic report is incorrect in saying no need for high school <br /> • The school district has been irresponsible with money, and will support plan because of additional <br /> money that it will come to the district, but the funds will not actually go towards students <br /> • How have the 4-story apartments on W. Las Positas Boulevard factored into school projections? <br /> • The proposed school site should not be next to quarryfZ„ <br /> • 1,300 students to come from 1,300 units doesn't make sense (n <br /> • Assuming declining birth rates in the past is disastrous since the City is repopulating with younger FW' <br /> families O, <br /> • General Plan requires a maximum of 600 students at elementary schools, 1,000 students at middle <br /> schools, and 2,000 students at high schools with a 10%margin, and currently every Pleasanton aO1 <br /> school exceeds this maximum � <br /> • We need an additional high school <br /> • The school site is in the airport zone {m, <br /> rm <br /> • Will the proposed plan result in Pleasanton children being bussed to Dublin because of school <br /> overcrowding in Pleasanton? Z• <br /> • The plan indicates a sports field OR a school is guaranteed. A middle or high school should be <br /> • Schools drive quality of life <br /> • Alisal Elementary has always been out of compliance with enrollment targets in the General Plan <br /> • The school district has not yet felt the impact of the approved 1,600 units on schools Fz <br /> • Declining enrollment is hard to believe and if the report is wrong in this aspect,all elementary '< <br /> schools will exceed 1,000 students <br /> • Odd that demographic study fmds no new middle or high school needed, but that residents need to <br /> accept large school size <br /> • If the pause button is pushed on this plan,we have the opportunity to make the school situation <br /> better (e.g. consider a charter school) <br /> • Dublin assumed an increase of 1 student per household but student generation realistically came to 3 <br /> students per household and thus they had to build new schools <br /> • California ranks 49th in the nation in public schools <br /> • The 1,700 units to be constructed to comply with RI-INA plus the planned 1,300 homes in East <br /> Pleasanton would mean 3,000 new units. At a rate of 3 students per unit, this equates to 9,000 <br /> students <br /> • School data is unreliable since younger families are moving into Pleasanton because of the schools, <br /> replacing older residents <br /> • Friends' children went to 2 different elementary schools—think of schools before housing <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.