My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5B
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
042715 CITY-SCHOOL
>
5B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:52:25 PM
Creation date
4/24/2015 2:41:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
5B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1: Existing and Projected Student Enrollment (Total) <br /> Schools Existing (2014) Projected (2024) Net Change <br /> Elementary (Grades TK-5) 6,269 5,802 -467 <br /> Middle (6-8) 3,594 3,471 -123 <br /> High (9-12) 4,903 5,115 +212 <br /> Total 14,766 14,388 -132 <br /> Source: Davis Demographics&Planning,2015. <br /> Table 2: Existing and Projected Student Enrollment (Average Per School*) <br /> Schools Existing (2014) Projected (2024) Net Change <br /> Elementary (Grades TK-5) 697 645 -52 <br /> Middle (6-8) 1,198 1,157 -41 <br /> High (9-12) 2,452 2,556 +104 i <br /> *Rounded to nearest whole number. <br /> Source: Davis Demographics& Planning, 2015. <br /> Table 3: Students Generated by EPSP Buildout* <br /> Schools Students <br /> Elementary (Grades TK-5) 746 <br /> Middle (6-8) 360 <br /> High (9-12) 194 <br /> Total 1,300 <br /> *Rounded to nearest whole number. <br /> Source: Davis Demographics&Planning,2015. <br /> b. Status of EPSP. Preparation of the EPSP began in earnest after establishment <br /> of the Task Force in July 2012. The Task Force originally agreed on a set of six <br /> working draft plan alternatives that included a mix of open space, park, industrial, <br /> campus office, school, retail, and high- and low-density residential land uses. The <br /> residential components of the six alternatives ranged from 1,000 to 2,279 <br /> residential units. In August 2014, after City Council directed staff and the Task <br /> Force to explore plan alternatives that did not include zoning for high-density <br /> housing, the Task Force voted to change the Base Plan to include 1,300 <br /> residential units with no high-density housing, 1,636,000 square feet of non- <br /> residential development, 759 acres of open space, and an elementary school site. <br /> City Council confirmed this Base Plan in December 2014 and directed that nine <br /> Plan alternatives be evaluated in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on <br /> the Draft Plan, ranging from an alternative allowing for no new development to an <br /> alternative containing 1,430 single-family and multi-family residential units. The <br /> Draft EIR was published in April 2015 and the associated public/agency comment <br /> period will end on June 8, 2015. City staff also held well-attended neighborhood <br /> meetings on the Draft Plan on April 12 and April 23. An additional neighborhood <br /> meeting is scheduled for April 29. The City had planned to hold a community-wide <br /> meeting on the Draft Plan after the conclusion of these neighborhood meetings. <br /> This would only occur if the Council decides to continue with the EPSP process. If <br /> the Council decides to continue with the process, the Plan would return to the <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.