Laserfiche WebLink
unpermitted and take action only if it becomes a nuisance. Regardless of their approach, most of 16 <br /> California cities that have adopted beekeeping regulations have had generally positive experiences with <br /> few reported problems. <br /> • <br /> As proposed by the code amendment, the process would be primarily administered by staff and closely <br /> tracks that used for small scale planning projects that at least some potential for neighborhood impacts <br /> such as the administrative Design Review or permit process for large family daycare facilities. The <br /> beekeeper would be required to submit an application that would include basic information regarding <br /> the property and layout of the operation. Staff would review the application to ensure conformance with <br /> the performance standards and notify neighbors within a 100 foot radius of the site. This is the same <br /> radius used for large family daycare facilities but larger than that used for Design Review applications. <br /> Neighbors may register their objections to the application during the 7 day noticing period and staff <br /> would weigh the merits of the objection in deciding whether or not to approve the application — <br /> reasonable medical claims would result in denial of the permit application. The decision to approve or <br /> reject the application would be followed by a 15 day appeal period, with the final decision being <br /> reported on the Zoning Administrator's report to the City Council. This decision could then be appealed <br /> to the Planning Commission and then City Council, or pulled from the report by either the Council or <br /> Commission. Following the appeal period, city staff would inspect the hive to ensure conformance with <br /> the performance measures. <br /> Mr. Weinstein reviewed the proposed performance standards, which incorporate the science and best <br /> practices of beekeeping and are crafted to ensure that the activity is undertaken safely, productively <br /> and without nuisance to neighbors. <br /> • Beekeeping would be allowed only in the Agricultural zoning district and on properties with <br /> detached single-family homes, which are found in the R-1 and R-M zones and within the <br /> Downtown Specific Plan area. It would not be allowed in any residence that is not single-family <br /> and detached, regardless of zoning district. <br /> • The applicant must live on the property where the hive is located. <br /> • Hives must be located at least 5 feet from property lines and are generally confined to rear <br /> yards. <br /> • Only 2 hives are permitted on single-family residential properties and no more than 10 are <br /> permitted on properties within agricultural districts. <br /> • Equipment must be kept in good order to prevent conditions that would encourage bees to leave <br /> the hive or swarm. This includes requirements for a water source, removable frames and other <br /> similar amenities. <br /> • A flyaway barrier, typically in the form of a fence or hedge, shall be provided so that bees are <br /> required to cross the property line at a minimum height of 6 feet. <br /> • The hive entrance must be oriented away from or parallel to the nearest property line. <br /> • The queen bee must be replaced regularly to prevent swarming. <br /> These standards and provisions allow for the rejection of a permit application if beekeeping is found to <br /> be contrary or detrimental to public health. The Planning Commission also added a provision allowing <br /> for more flexibility on lots with unique size, location or topographical characteristics. <br /> On January 28, 2015 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposed <br /> ordinance. The Commission engaged in a wide-ranging discussion that included everything from colony <br /> counts to fees to beekeeping at the White House. Following its discussion, the Commission made two <br /> changes to the proposed ordinance. The first was to clarify the maximum hive height of 4 feet would be <br /> inclusive of a stand. The second was to allow the Zoning Administrator to approve additional or taller <br /> hives for properties with the characteristics previously mentioned. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 12 February 17,2015 <br />