My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
031715
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:42:18 PM
Creation date
3/11/2015 11:54:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/17/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AYES: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Olson, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> 9. Public Hearing: P14-1276, City of Pleasanton — Consider introduction of an ordinance to amend <br /> Title 18 (Zoning) of the Pleasanton Municipal Code to establish a permit process and performance <br /> standards for beekeeping <br /> Planning Manager Weinstein presented the staff report, introducing the proposed ordinance that would <br /> allow beekeeping in Pleasanton. The current proposal originated from a resident who learned from a <br /> code enforcement officer that his existing hives were not a permitted use in his residential <br /> neighborhood. Beekeeping has been prohibited in Pleasanton since 1926. While the prohibition is not <br /> part of the Municipal Code, the code allows beekeeping in agricultural districts only and not in any other <br /> districts as either a permitted or conditionally permitted use. <br /> At the request of the City Council, staff undertook research and evaluation of the potential merits and <br /> risks of legalizing beekeeping in Pleasanton. This effort included speaking with agencies with adopted <br /> regulations regarding beekeeping, reviewing literature on the subject, and visits to an apiary in <br /> unincorporated Contra Costa County. While admittedly skeptical at the outset, Mr. Weinstein said that <br /> his research concluded with the sense that beekeeping could be safely conducted on detached single- <br /> family residential sites and in agricultural zones, particularly with implementation of carefully developed <br /> performance measures. The proposed ordinance is founded on the experience of many cities <br /> throughout the country that have had a generally positive experience with regulated beekeeping. <br /> Mr. Weinstein shared several photos of both the European honeybee and the common yellow jacket, <br /> the former of which is the subject of the ordinance. He explained that whereas the yellow jacket is a <br /> predatory wasp responsible for many of the stings the public has encountered, the European honeybee <br /> is domesticated and non-aggressive insect that is well adapted to honey production. While both are <br /> currently present in Pleasanton, yellow jackets would not be permitted to colonize hives as part of the <br /> proposed ordinance. He briefly reviewed several examples of beekeeping equipment, clarifying that a <br /> single tower of stacked boxes makes up one hive. <br /> He reviewed the benefits of beekeeping, which center largely around the pollination that enhances the <br /> productivity of agricultural crops and gardens but also includes the production of useful substances like <br /> honey and beeswax. Urban and suburban beekeeping is also widely considered to be a means of <br /> increasing resilience to colony collapse through increased bee populations and enhancing genetic <br /> diversity. Risks center primarily on stings with roughly 2% of the population possessing what is <br /> considered a hypersensitivity to bees. Not underestimating that risk, he reminded the Council and <br /> public that domestic bees have been domesticated over many years and are considered docile and not <br /> a major culprit of stings. It is also worth noting that bees currently live in Pleasanton and will continue to <br /> do so regardless of the outcome of this ordinance. Swarming, which is the most likely situation in which <br /> multiple stings would occur, typically results when hives are in need of additional forage or seeking a <br /> new queen. Therefore, measure can be incorporated into beekeeping operations to prevent or minimize <br /> the likelihood of swarming. It also worth noting that Africanized bees, which have been the subject of <br /> many fictional and real incidents, are not present and do not survive well in areas with frosts and <br /> freezes and are not present in the Bay Area. <br /> Mr. Weinstein explained that several local communities including Livermore, Fremont and San Ramon <br /> have existing beekeeping regulations, some of which have been in place for several decades. In <br /> general, many cities regulate bees by lot size but impose relatively few requirements on how the hives <br /> are operated. Staff elected to employ the approach used in Santa Monica, which focuses more on the <br /> design of beekeeping operations and the incorporation of performance standards as opposed to lot size <br /> as a more focused and effective way to ensure that bees do not become a nuisance. Another option <br /> which is employed in San Francisco and several other notable cities is to allow beekeeping to occur <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 12 February 17, 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.