My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
030315
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:36:06 PM
Creation date
2/24/2015 3:44:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> In 2012, the Economic Development Department staff along with the City's Economic <br /> Vitality Committee worked with JD Franz Research, Inc. to conduct a baseline business <br /> needs survey among Pleasanton companies. Significant attention was paid to ensuring <br /> the results of that survey were statistically valid, and thus was reliably indicative of the <br /> collective commercial community. That effort included pre-survey focus groups, <br /> development of a survey instrument, and conducting a telephone survey of required <br /> sample population and business characteristics (i.e., company size and industry sector). <br /> The process also included an online survey; given the distribution channels of the online <br /> survey — primarily through Pleasanton business organizations — it was not considered <br /> statistically valid due to the small sample size and self-selected proportion of the city's <br /> business population. <br /> The results of the survey process were shared with the City Council in February 2013. <br /> Overall, Pleasanton businesses reported being happy with their location, with nine in ten <br /> companies finding the community an excellent or good place to do business. In <br /> particular, they cited the city's central location, which provides access to the regional <br /> market, and friendly people, as businesses feel supported by the community. All of the <br /> ratings of the city as a business location are above the level of good. In addition, ratings <br /> of the city's infrastructure and services were generally good. With the sole exception of <br /> entertainment options, city amenities also rated highly especially for local schools and <br /> community events. <br /> Challenges that emerged from the survey findings included a perception that the City <br /> has rules and regulations that make it somewhat difficult to do business and a sense <br /> that the City is in some way insufficiently connected to the local business community. <br /> Notably, staff was consistently rated from good to high suggesting that the challenges <br /> may arise from the process. Specific issues noted in the survey were problematic <br /> telecommunications — particularly cellular service — and inadequate public <br /> transportation. <br /> It was intended the survey create a baseline of data points, and that periodic future <br /> surveys would be conducted to identify new and changing trends in the Pleasanton <br /> business community. This assists Economic Development staff, the EVC, and local <br /> business organizations such as the Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce, the Pleasanton <br /> Downtown Association and Hacienda Owners Association in defining and developing <br /> business support programs and projects to further position Pleasanton as an excellent <br /> location in which to do business. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> As Economic Development staff and the Economic Vitality Committee consider this <br /> second business needs survey, there is agreement the most valuable approach will be <br /> to replicate the same process with the same consultant — focus groups, survey <br /> instrument revision/update, and telephone survey — however, eliminating the online <br /> survey. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.