My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
021715
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:34:49 PM
Creation date
2/11/2015 3:36:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
9
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
residential zoning districts. Napa and San Ramon permit residential beekeeping by right <br /> and Santa Monica requires registration through their respective animal control/services <br /> division. None of these three cities had incidents to report. Furthermore, larger, more <br /> densely populated cities such as San Francisco, New York City and London also permit <br /> beekeeping, and staff has not found evidence of significant problems. The proposed PMC <br /> amendments, which include specific performance measures designed to reduce swarming <br /> and other potentially adverse effects on neighboring properties, and require an inspection <br /> by the City of new hives, are more robust than many other beekeeping ordinances <br /> reviewed by staff, some of which have no specific permitting requirements. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice of this item was published in The Valley Times and was noted in the Pleasanton <br /> Weekly. At the time this report was prepared, staff had not received public comments <br /> beyond those already provided to the Planning Commission. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> The proposed amendments are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> (CEQA), per regulation 15061(b)(3). Therefore, no environmental documentation <br /> accompanies this report. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Staffs research indicates that beekeeping is a use that is compatible with other suburban <br /> uses, as domestic bees are typically docile and nonaggressive, and become defensive <br /> only when their hives are directly threatened. With the exception of the incident in Fremont <br /> where the beekeeper stopped maintaining a hive, other cities contacted by staff have not <br /> had any issues with beekeeping. In addition, staff has not identified significant safety or <br /> other concerns about domestic beekeeping in reviewing literature on the subject. The <br /> proposed changes to the PMC are intended to establish performance standards, noted <br /> above, for beekeeping that will ensure that such operators will have minimal adverse <br /> impact on residents and will enhance the environmental health of the City. <br /> Submitted by: Fiscal Review: Approved by: <br /> /(1/ <br /> Brian Dolan, Director Tina Olson Nelson Fialho <br /> Community Development Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Ordinance with proposed redline changes <br /> 2. January 28, 2015 Planning Commission Staff Report, including the following <br /> Exhibits: <br /> B. Data on jurisdictions that permit beekeeping <br /> C. October 8, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Excerpt <br /> 3. January 28, 2015 Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes Excerpt <br /> 4. Public correspondence received after publication of the January 28, 2015 Planning <br /> Commission Staff Report <br /> Page 9 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.