Laserfiche WebLink
and younger bees will remain in the hive and the previous queen and older bees will <br /> swarm to find a new hive. Requeening by the beekeeper will help prevent swarming; <br /> therefore, staff is proposing that the hive be requeened once every two years. <br /> K. Upon securing a beekeeping permit, an inspection of the site and hives by the City's <br /> code enforcement officer, animal services officer, or their designee (collectively the <br /> inspector), is required at least one week, but no later than three weeks, after <br /> bringing the bees on-site. For such inspections, beekeeper shall be at the site to <br /> meet inspector. <br /> Staff analysis: Staff is proposing that the hives be inspected by the City's code <br /> enforcement officer after a beekeeping permit is granted in order to ensure that the <br /> beekeeper is meeting the performance standards (i.e., amount of hives, setbacks, <br /> flyway barrier, water source). Because there is a relatively high barrier to entry <br /> associated with a new beekeeping operation (acquiring bee hives, beekeeping <br /> equipment, and bees may cost upwards of $1,000), the City does not expect a large <br /> number of beekeeping applications. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> On January 28, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of <br /> the proposed PMC amendment included in Attachment 1. Draft minutes from the meeting <br /> are included as Attachment 3. Three members of the public spoke, all in support of the <br /> proposed amendments. The Planning Commission discussion covered several aspects of <br /> the proposed PMC amendment, including the technical expertise required to undertake the <br /> site inspection that would be required by the PMC amendment; the size and configuration <br /> of typical hives; and fees. In recommending approval of the proposed PMC amendment, <br /> Planning Commission made two additional recommendations (which are incorporated into <br /> the draft ordinance in Attachment 1): <br /> a) In section 18.103.080, modify subsection (I) to state: "The maximum height of a <br /> hive, including the stand, shall not exceed four feet." <br /> b) In section 18.103.080, create a new subsection (L) that states: "Notwithstanding <br /> the standards set forth above, the Zoning Administrator (or his or her designee) has <br /> discretion to approve additional hives and/or hives in excess of 4 feet in height if the <br /> size, topography, or other physical conditions of the lot can accommodate such <br /> hives." <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Staff is in support of the proposed PMC amendments and believes that beekeeping can be <br /> undertaken safely in accordance with the performance measures included in the <br /> amendments. In general, many cities in California and throughout the U.S. permit <br /> beekeeping, and staff has identified few reported problems. The cities of Livermore and <br /> Fremont have had regulations in place for beekeeping in residential zoning districts for a <br /> few decades. Both cities require a fanciers permit prior to keeping bees, secured through <br /> their respective police departments. Fremont reported one incident in the last seven years <br /> where a beekeeper stopped maintaining the hive and the bees swarmed, but people were <br /> not stung. Livermore reported no incidents, likely a function of a beekeeping ordinance that <br /> restricts beekeeping to only a few properties. The cities of Napa, San Ramon, and Santa <br /> Monica have adopted regulations in the last one to five years to allow beekeeping in <br /> Page 8 of 9 <br />