CCMIN121614 - Laserfiche WebLink

city to repurpose the land to a use that will be a true asset to the community moving forward. He said that Kewitt has been fully engaged in the Task Force process and supports its recommendations. Ganping Ju congratulated Councilmembers Narum and Olson on the recent election, noting that this is an excellent opportunity for them to demonstrate their commitment to the Development Plan process and slow growth. He cited several concerns shared with him by his neighbors in the Ironwood Community. Of the greatest concern is the overall number of units, which most feel is excessive and would negatively impact the quality of life across the city. He said he was disappointed to hear some push back at the latest Task Force meeting relative to adding a statement acknowledging that the driving force behind the total unit count is infrastructure costs and thought it should not be assumed that this is well known. He urged the Council to request that staff exercise due diligence in identifying meaningful ways to reduce infrastructure costs such that the total number of units can be reduced. He also expressed concern with the assumption that the El Charro extension is needed to mitigated traffic impacts of the plan and asked that this assumption be more thoroughly examined. Mayor Thorne closed public comment. MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Narum to authorize the City Manager to approve a Third Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with Rasmussen Planning, Inc., and Gates + Associates for $116,624 for services related to the preparation of the EPSP and EIR. Motion passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thorne NOES: None ABSENT: None RECUSED: Councilmember Olson Councilmember Brown thanked the public for their comments. She called attention to Mr. Ritter's reading of the Vision Statement which says that land use in East Pleasanton should benefit the entire community and noted that some citizens have shared comments that they don't feel the alternatives presented in this EIR will accomplish that. She stressed that she is not opposed to development of the East Side but said that it needs to be a project that the community can get behind and that whatever comes forward should go to the voters. She reiterated her concern over the Urban Growth Boundary, which represents a clear and physical limit to the sprawl of development within Pleasanton. She also reiterated her original misunderstanding regarding recreational possibilities at the Chain of Lakes, noting again Zone 7's own admission that Cope Lake is not suitable for recreation. Nonetheless, the steep rocky slopes of the lakes and their proximity to adjacent homes does present a safety hazard that needs to be addressed, likely by some sort of barrier fencing that is incongruous with the recreation area she had originally envisioned. She stressed that both the EIR and Task Force need to take a careful study of Measure FF and the intent of the voters, stating again that expanding the Urban Growth Boundary by 112 acres is not what she would consider a minor change. She again said that she supports some level of development of the Plan area but is not comfortable supporting something as intense as the Base Plan, and thought that even 500 units might be excessive. Vice-Mayor Pentin said that he too is concerned with the Urban Growth Boundary but again noted that Measure FF initiative anticipated from the start that the quarry lands would be evaluated for development at some point at the future and that this may lead to a revision of the Urban Growth Boundary. He reminded the Council and public that the discussions regarding what is minor versus what is major are a discussion topic for another day, though he is not convinced that anything identified in either the Base Plan or alternatives represents a major change. He also reminded the Council and public that he served 6 years on the Parks and Recreation Commission and said that Chain of Lakes were never viewed as an active recreation area aside from the potential for trails around them. He said he did not envision this changing based on Zone's 7 intent or anything outlined in this plan, and also noted that the lakes are already surrounded by chain link fencing regardless of what does or does not City Council Minutes Page 9 of 18 Dec 16,2014