My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
012015
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 1:59:39 PM
Creation date
1/20/2015 12:04:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/20/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Karen Diaz <br /> Subject: FW: protest for dog park SUPPLEMENTAL JIATEIROAL <br /> Provided to the City Council <br /> After Distribution of Packet <br /> From: Pankaj Trivedi <br /> Sent: 1/16/2015 7:21 PM Date <br /> To:Steven Bocia n <br /> Subject: protest for dog park <br /> Hello - I, as a resident of Tapestry way, strongly oppose creating a dog park near my area. I understand that <br /> people need place for dogs. But resident security and children's right to have a park come first. Unleashed dogs <br /> can cause harm or scare little children, which will make using trail difficult. <br /> Instead of a dog park, we should consider having a children park at that location. I ahve to take my kids to parks <br /> which are away from my place. If we had a park nearly it would benefit lot more residents than if we have a dog <br /> park. (everyone has a kid normally, but not everyone has a dog) <br /> Thank you. <br /> Pankaj <br /> t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.