13 - Laserfiche WebLink

additional shade structure not be added. However, to address the shade situation, staff is recommending a few more trees in the center of the park and the addition of two roundabout benches that can accommodate visitor seating. Also, the addition of trees around the perimeter of the park will add needed shade areas for visitors and dogs. 4. Add Dog Play Equipment — The architect has proposed a number of pieces of dog play equipment as shown in Attachment 1. 5. Installation of Additional Dog Waste Bag Dispensers — Staff is recommending retaining the three dog waste bag dispensers as proposed (one at the small dog park and two at the all dog park) based on general observation regarding need and so as to not overly entice vandalism or litter. (Responsible dog owners are used to carrying doggie waste bags and staff assumes that this will continue at the dog park.) Further, in the event that after opening it's determined that additional dispensers are needed, they can be added. 6. Change the designation of the area reserved for large dogs to include all dogs—This change has been made. It is however, important to note, that a significant amount of literature on municipal dog parks recommends not mixing large and small dogs and therefore, there is still some concern regarding the mixing of small dogs with larger ones in one area. 7. Remove Picnic Tables — These have been removed, except for the table in the shade structure. 8. Review the Design of the Dog Entry Gates — These have been amended to facilitate easier access. Public Comment As indicated, staff and Robert Tanaka held a neighborhood meeting on November 12 at the Pleasanton Tennis Park and Community Center with individuals who have recently expressed concern with the location of the dog park. Ten residents attended the meeting. Three residents at the meeting supported the dog park. Staff has also attached emails received recently concerning the park's location as Attachment 3. In general, those who attended the meeting who are opposed to the dog park expressed concern with the potential for noise impacting the Foothill Place neighborhood immediately west of the project location and traffic on Bemal Avenue. Emails and phone calls received, which are from the Meadowlark Drive area to the north and the West Lagoon area to the south/east, expand this concem to include a potential decrease in property values and an overall disruption to the neighborhood. While it is always difficult to fully address concerns for this type of development due to the uncertainty of use and, in this case, the actions of animals, staffs general response to the concerns are as follows: • Property Values — Staff was unable to find data supporting the loss of property values due to the proximity of a municipal dog park and in general, while loss of property value is a common concern expressed in response to a public or private development that may be Page 3