08 - Laserfiche WebLink

• City of Pleasanton Recycled Water Project CEQA Addendum Table 3 Environmental Review of Proposed Project Changes Do Proposed Changes Are Prior Involve Any New Mitigation What were the New Circumstances Measures Where Impact(s) Environmental Significant Involving New Any New Sufficient for were Analyzed Impact or Significant Information Addressing in conclusions for Substantially Impacts Requiring Any New Prior the Original More or Substantially New Potential Environmental Proposed Severe More Severe Analysis or Changes or Environmental Issue Area Documents. Project? Impacts? I Impacts? _ Verification? Impacts? • None identified or necessary. Project Change Discussion: The proposed changes to the Proposed would have the same or less impact on utilities and service systems as the Original Proposed Project. The addition of 720 feet or 0.1 mile of new pipeline would not result in any new impacts as was evaluated in the IS/MND. Also, the construction activities associated with the revised pipeline conveyance facilities would be substantially the same as they were originally described in the IS/MND as they would also be constructed within existing roadways, highly disturbed areas, and/or public right-of-ways. The Revised Proposed Project therefore would not have any incrementally significant effects on utilities and service systems as defined in CEQA Guideline section 15162(a). IS/MND Mandatory Pages 3-44 LTS/M No No No Yes Findings of and 3-45 Significance IS/MND Discussion: With the incorporation of the previously identified mitigation measures, the Proposed Project will not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Any impacts from the Proposed Project in these areas are considered here to be less-than-significant with the implementation and incorporation of the above mentioned mitigation measures. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183,the environmental analysis in this Initial Study was conducted to determine if there were any project-specific effects as a result of the Proposed Project. No direct project-specific significant effects were identified that could not be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. Mitigation Measures incorporated herein mitigate any potential contribution to cumulative (as well as direct) impacts associated with these environmental issues. Therefore, the Proposed Project does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. As a result of mitigation included in this environmental document, the Proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse effects to humans, either directly or indirectly. IS/MND Mitigation Measures: • See previous mitigation measures for each resource category as identified above. Project Change Discussion: The proposed changes to the Proposed would have the same or less impacts the environment and humans as the Original Proposed Project.The addition of 720 feet or 0.1 mile of new pipeline would not result in any new impacts as was evaluated in the IS/MND. Also, the construction activities associated with the revised pipeline conveyance facilities would be substantially the same as they were originally described in the 1S/MND as they would also be constructed within existing roadways, highly disturbed areas, and/or public right-of-ways. The Revised Proposed Project therefore would not have any incrementally significant effects on the environment and humans as defined in CEQA Guideline section I5162(a). December 2014 3-12