My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
012015
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:02:27 PM
Creation date
1/14/2015 12:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/20/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
8
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton Recycled Water Project <br /> CEQA Addendum <br /> • An impact is considered less than significant if the analysis concludes that the impact would <br /> cause no substantial adverse change to the environment and that accordingly it would not require <br /> mitigation. <br /> • An impact is considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated if the analysis <br /> concludes that, with the inclusion of mitigation measures to which the project proponent has <br /> agreed,the impact would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment. <br /> • An impact is considered potentially significant if the analysis concludes that the impact exceeds <br /> applicable regulatory thresholds of significance and cannot be reduced to a less-than-significant <br /> level with potentially feasible mitigation. <br /> In assessing the impacts of the proposed alignment changes to the project as originally approved, the City <br /> is not assessing whether impacts are significant compared with existing physical conditions (i.e., <br /> conditions without implementation of any part of the project). Rather, the City is assessing how the <br /> incremental impacts, if any, associated with the proposed pipeline alignment changes compare with the <br /> impacts disclosed in the IS/MND. This approach is expressly sanctioned by the governing statutory and <br /> regulatory provisions and case law. (See Public Resources Code, § 21166; CEQA Guidelines, § 15162; <br /> Bowman v. City of Petaluma (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1065, 1078-1082; Temecula Band of Luiseno <br /> Mission Indians v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist. (1996)43 Cal.App.4th,425,438-439). <br /> 1.4 Organization of this Document <br /> CEQA Guidelines do not specify the format of addendums. The content and format of this Addendum is <br /> as follows. <br /> • Chapter 1, "Introduction," identifies the purpose, terminology, and organization of the <br /> Addendum. <br /> • Chapter 2, "Description of Proposed Project Change," identifies the proposed project refinements <br /> in detail. <br /> • Chapter 3, "Environmental Analysis," presents the analysis for each component of the project <br /> change. This chapter identifies the proposed project change's impacts in relevant resource <br /> categories. <br /> • Chapter 4, "Conclusion," summarizes the conclusions of the environmental review in this <br /> Addendum. <br /> • Chapter 5, "List of Preparers," identifies the individuals involved in preparing this Addendum <br /> and their areas of technical specialty. <br /> • <br /> December 2014 1-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.