My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
111814
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 11:31:06 AM
Creation date
11/13/2014 3:27:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Expanding Design Review Authority to the First Floor of Single-Family Homes <br /> The Municipal Code requires Administrative Design Review approval by the Zoning <br /> Administrator for additions to single-family homes which exceed 10 feet in height. For <br /> years, staff has conservatively interpreted this to also include exterior changes to single- <br /> family homes that exceed 10 feet in height such as the installation of new second floor <br /> windows or replacing a flat roof with a gable roof. The reasoning behind this <br /> interpretation is that such changes could result in similar privacy, massing, and/or view <br /> impacts as an addition which exceeds 10 feet in height. It was felt that the adjacent <br /> neighbors should be given an opportunity to comment on the project just as they would <br /> with an addition which exceeds 10 feet in height. With historic structures, proposed <br /> changes 10 feet or less in height (generally the first floor) are often problematic. The <br /> location, spacing, and size of window and door openings, as well as the type of windows <br /> and doors, are often significant character-defining features of historic homes. The design <br /> of porches and foundation treatments can also be important. The City does not currently <br /> have design review authority for such changes to historic homes and owners can <br /> currently remove or change significant character-defining features without triggering City <br /> review and approval. <br /> On June 4, 2013, the Historic Preservation Task Force updated the City Council on the <br /> results of their work since forming and had requested direction on specific items the Task <br /> Force was considering. At that time, the Task Force suggested that design review <br /> authority be expanded to include the first floor of structures on certain categories of <br /> homes, either all homes that are determined to be historic or all homes in a certain area <br /> such as the Downtown Specific Plan Area. At that time, the Council did not support a <br /> change to require Design Review for modifications to the first floor of single-family <br /> homes. <br /> Based on the feedback from the Council at the June 2013 check-in, the Task Force did <br /> not recommend that the Planning Commission or City Council require Design Review for <br /> modifications to the first floor of single-family homes as part of their package of <br /> amendments that were presented for adoption. However, some Task Force members <br /> had felt that expanding design review authority to the first floor of homes in the Downtown <br /> is critical to ensure that changes are consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan and <br /> Downtown Design Guidelines. Therefore, the Task Force had recommended that the <br /> City Council ask staff to continue to evaluate this item in the future. At the January 21, <br /> 2014, City Council meeting, Council agreed to have future discussion of this subject. <br /> Therefore, staff has brought this item back to Council for discussion and direction. <br /> A Municipal Code Amendment would be required to expand design review authority to <br /> include the first floor of single-family homes. The Code Amendment could be limited to <br /> single-family homes in residential zoning districts in the Downtown Specific Plan Area <br /> that are considered "historic resources" as determined by the historic resource survey. <br /> Furthermore, the Code amendment could codify staff's longstanding interpretation that <br /> exterior changes to single-family homes that exceed 10 feet in height are subject to <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.