My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
111814
>
14 ATTACHMENT 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 11:29:53 AM
Creation date
11/13/2014 2:54:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
14 ATTACHMENT 7
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> Program 13.1 : Zone sufficient land for neighborhood, community, and <br /> regional commercial uses to support Pleasanton's increasing business <br /> activity. <br /> Policy 14: Provide adequate neighborhood commercial acreage to serve <br /> the future needs of each neighborhood at buildout. <br /> Program 14.1 : Locate appropriately-scaled commercial centers with <br /> reasonable access to the residential neighborhoods they serve. <br /> In addition, the proposed project with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 9.5% is below <br /> the maximum 60% FAR allowed for commercial uses by the General Plan. <br /> Therefore, this would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> c. There is no habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan <br /> applicable to the project area. Therefore, this would be categorized as no- <br /> impact. <br /> 5.11. MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> • ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING <br /> The project site is urbanized and mineral extraction would be infeasible. <br /> STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br /> For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if <br /> the proposed project would: <br /> • Result in the depletion of a mineral resource. <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Mineral Resources <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X <br /> resource that would be of value to the region and <br /> the residents of the state? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important X <br /> mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local <br /> general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.