14 ATTACHMENT 05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Discussion Point No. 2: Would 24-hour operation for the convenience market and 7:00 a.m. — 10:00 p.m. operation for the drive-through carwash be appropriate for this location? Commissioners combined Discussion Points 1 and 2 in their discussion. The Commission in general was concerned about the proximity of the proposed project to residential neighborhoods. Two Commissioners expressed concerns about the hours of the proposed carwash and convenience store (including impacts on adjacent residential uses) and potential noise impacts from the carwash facility. One Commissioner did not feel the proposed uses are suitable for the location and indicated that crime incidents need to be analyzed. Discussion Point No. 3: Would it be acceptable to provide a total of 17 on-site parking spaces where a total of 18 on-site parking spaces would be required based on PMC? The Parking Ordinance requires self-service stations to provide one parking space and an additional parking space for each employee on the maximum shift. The applicant informed staff that the employee at the proposed convenience market would attend to patrons at the existing gas station. Therefore, the proposed 17 on-site parking stalls met the parking requirement. No discussion occun-ed. Discussion Point No. 4: Are the proposed site plan, circulation, and parking layout acceptable? Discussion Point No. 5: Is the proposed building design acceptable? Commissioners combined Discussion Points 4 and 5 in their discussion. The Commission in general indicated that the existing circulation at the project site and the adjoining shopping centers to the east and south could be congested at times. The majority of the Commissioners stated the site layout is generally acceptable. One Commissioner questioned if another location on the project site would better suit the drive-through carwash and the other Commissioners indicated the location of the proposed carwash is appropriate if it meets the noise requirements. The majority of the Commission stated that the proposed building design is acceptable. One Commissioner indicated that the design could be improved to be more complementary to the shopping center. One Commissioner indicated that the building needs to be designed to be energy efficient. July 31, 2014, Neighborhood Meeting The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on July 31, 2014, at St. Elizabeth Seton Church located at 6001 Stoneridge Drive. Staff (Jenny Soo and Adam Weinstein) attended the meeting. The applicant presented the proposal to the residents, and the following key items were discussed: Hours of operation of the convenience market and drive-through carwash; PUD-102/P14-0014 Planning Commission Page 3 of 26