01 - Laserfiche WebLink

With regards to the caveat noted by the Vice-Mayor, Mr. Fialho explained that the city will have an opportunity to respond to all comments provided by HCD prior to preparing the Housing Element for adoption by the Council in January. If for some reason HCD were to disagree with the down-zoning of the CM Capital 2 site the Council will have an opportunity to respond in a public meeting prior to final submittal. MOTION: It was m/s by Narum/Brown to accept the Planning Commission recommendation to rezone the CM Capital 2 site to a density of 12.5 units per acre and to implement a building height limitation of 40-feet. Motion passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thome NOES: Councilmember Cook-Kallio ABSENT: None Referring back to Program 46.5, Councilmember Narum requested a modification to the section which discusses "secure(ing) property" as she infers something different than what staff has described as the intent. Mr. Fialho agreed that staff could work to clarify that the city is in the process of planning the east side and that inherent in that process is a commitment to not discriminate against family housing that is affordable to low and very low incomes. With direction from the Council staff would submit the new language to HCD for review and bring it forward to the Council prior to adoption. Councilmember Brown said the comment that "growth is choking our small town feel" resonates with her as true. She conceded that some Council at some point approved the development that she now lives in but said that does not preclude this Council from recognizing the need for a pause in development. She reiterated that Program 10 requires that development be consistent with the city's infrastructure capacity and thought perhaps the Council should more firmly direct staff to identify a feasible method for using a lack of such infrastructure to slow growth. She said that the development of East Pleasanton is not needed to meet the city's housing obligations nor does it necessarily make for a good community. She thanked Mr. Bowen for pointing out that the Housing Element's intent is to develop the goals and objectives sought by the community. She assured the public that she is here to represent them, whether it relates to water or schools, and will not sit here with her tail between her legs simply because the city was sued for taking a stand in the past. She stressed that her priority is ensuring that Pleasanton has the authority and the ability to retain its greatness and said that to do so they must take a step back and look at how to reasonably and responsibly take on more development. She said it was with great reluctance that she approved the down-zoning of the CM Capital 2 site as she would have preferred to remove the residential overlay altogether. She noted that even with the reduced zoning there is the potential for over 1,300 units to be developed in the Hacienda area in the near future. Despite the stated goal of spreading high-density development throughout the community, the majority of development that has come forward remains in this area. She appreciated Councilmember Narum's comments regarding Program 46.5, which she felt reaffirmed the very planning efforts that she voted against not long ago. Mayor Thorne explained that the primary reason he voted to move forward with planning of the east side is because he made a commitment to the community that they would place any plan on the ballot if and when it was complete. What that does is ensure that no high-density housing will be distributed through this area with approval by the voters despite whatever RHNA numbers may come forward. He repeated his strong desire for slow growth but said he would trust in Growth Management to accomplish that as much as is possible while still ensuring the city has a certified Housing Element. City Council Minutes Page 15 of 17 September 2, 2014