My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
071514
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2015 4:29:01 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 12:54:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
were 450 years ago and announced they would be performing Taming of the Shrew this year. He <br /> invited the Council to join them on Friday June 27"' for a buffet dinner before the dress rehearsal. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 9. Update on Stage 3 water shortage; authorization of funding to conduct drought education and <br /> outreach; and introduce an ordinance to amend the Municipal Code §9.30 regarding outdoor <br /> irrigation restrictions and prohibition against decorative water features not recirculating water <br /> Director of Operation Services Smith presented the staff report. He first provided an update on relevant <br /> actions since he last reported to the Council on the drought. The California Department of Water <br /> Resources recently issued clarifying language that would seem to bolster the idea that the 5% <br /> allocation will be made available September 1, 2014. At the local level, Zone 7 staff has elected not to <br /> put forward a recommendation that its board institute a 15% drought surcharge on all water sales. <br /> Pleasanton, along with other local retailers and members of the public, felt there was not sufficient data <br /> to support the recommendation. Zone 7 also reported that its efforts to purchase or trade for new water <br /> sources have been unsuccessful to date. One preliminary deal with southern California's Metropolitan <br /> Water called for a one to three trade of the valley's water groundwater banks against Metropolitan <br /> Water's northern California stores, but was ultimately not supported by the agency's board. <br /> Mayor Thorne said he frequently hears comments and complaints regarding the city's aggressive <br /> approach, which calls for a fine structure rather than a tiered rate structure. <br /> Mr. Smith confirmed that the city has taken a different approach than other retailers in the valley, who <br /> have essentially increased the fees for all water in an effort to discourage use. Depending on the <br /> jurisdiction, this could be as much as a 50 to 100% increase over normal rates. Pleasanton elected to <br /> take a proactive approach and focus instead on helping people to conserve and fining only those who <br /> failed to make the required remedy. He acknowledged that some might find this unfair but reminded <br /> them that the alternative could lead to a shutdown of the entire system for fire protection purposes, <br /> which is still a possibility depending on temperatures this summer. He noted that Pleasanton has <br /> prohibitions just like any other jurisdiction, but has yet to issue any citations or apply penalties. He also <br /> noted that based on the current formula only a very small percentage of users (2.8% in one billing <br /> group) would have been eligible for a penalty when the mandatory conservation started, and most of <br /> those were in fact using more water than in 2013. He stressed that penalizing users for attempting to do <br /> their part is not the intent and reiterated that staffs ultimate goal is not to issue any penalties at all. <br /> Mayor Thome noted that whatever the approach, the city has been quite successful in its efforts. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio reported that the savings in her own bill has been rather profound and, <br /> while her family is making a concerted effort, they are not suffering as a result of reduced consumption. <br /> She also stressed that those who have already demonstrated significant efforts to conserve are not <br /> even under consideration for a penalty, even if they cannot reduce their use further. <br /> Mr. Smith confirmed, reiterating that users who have already minimized their use significantly will not be <br /> penalized. He explained that when approached by someone with this concern, the first thing he does is <br /> review their history to see if and where any additional savings can be achieved. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio asked if temporary anomalies that would increase usage, such as <br /> houseguests, is something the city takes into consideration. <br /> Mr. Smith said they could, but that outdoor irrigation is really likely to be the culprit in excessive usage. <br /> Mr. Smith provided a progress update on the city's conservation efforts. He noted that since first <br /> speaking to the Council about conservation, staff has modified its approach to use production data <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 14 June 17,2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.