Laserfiche WebLink
In July 2012, the City Council entered into an agreement with RJM Design Group, Inc., <br /> to prepare a Parks and Recreation Master Plan for the purpose of providing a realistic <br /> and visionary guide for the creative, orderly development and management of parks, <br /> recreation facilities and programs for the City, within the context of the General Plan. <br /> To assist with the project, staff determined it was beneficial to have ongoing community <br /> participation, dialogue and direction. Similar to past large scale community based <br /> planning efforts, staff recommended a community-based committee and City Council <br /> On August 21, 2012, the City Council approved the formation of a fourteen member <br /> Parks and Recreation Master Plan Steering Committee consisting of two (2) Parks and <br /> Recreation Commissioners, one (1) Civic Arts Commissioner, one (1) Human Services <br /> Commissioner, one (1) Youth Commissioner, two (2) Youth Sports Board Members, one <br /> (1) Senior Advisory Committee Board Member, one (1) Pleasanton Unified School <br /> District Representative, one (1) Pleasanton Downtown Association Representative, one <br /> (1) YMCA Representative, one (1) other Local Service Provider plus the addition of two <br /> (2) Parent's-at-large Representatives. <br /> As the process unfolded, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Steering Committee <br /> assisted with the development of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan by providing <br /> adequate public participation and guidance during the planning process. With the <br /> Steering Committee's assistance, the planning process for the Parks and Recreation <br /> Master Plan began in September 2012. <br /> Public Process <br /> As part of the development of the Master Plan, there was a substantial requirement of <br /> soliciting, measuring and analyzing community data and providing accurate and timely <br /> feedback. In addition to the monthly Steering Committee meetings, there were <br /> significant opportunities for public input, including discussions with City advisory groups <br /> and stakeholders. They included: <br /> Executive Interviews: Interviewed stakeholders such as key City personnel, <br /> community leaders, school district personnel, etc., to gain valuable perspective <br /> regarding needs, expectations and current conditions. <br /> • Sports Organizations & Community Based Organization Questionnaires: Through <br /> the use of questionnaires, solicited the attitudes and perceived needs of <br /> recreation facilities as viewed by user groups in the City. <br /> • Community-wide Telephone Survey: Conducted a statistically reliable survey of <br /> approximately 300 residents to measure their use, participation and satisfaction <br /> regarding the City's parks, recreation facilities use and programs, as well as <br /> solicit input regarding their current and future recreation needs <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br />