My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
041514
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2015 3:27:43 PM
Creation date
4/8/2014 3:14:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
2
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> This omnibus ordinance and resolution amending the Master Fee Schedule is an <br /> annual process to present minor and non-controversial changes to the Pleasanton <br /> Municipal Code and Master Fee Schedule. Many of these code amendments are to <br /> reflect changes in State law. These matters are generally so small in nature that a <br /> stand-alone City Council agenda item is not practical. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> This proposed omnibus ordinance and related resolution address the following: <br /> §2.29.030 Youth Commission Compensation — Some members of the Youth <br /> Commission are representatives under the age of 16. The California Labor Code does <br /> not allow such minors to receive compensation for "work" after 7:00 p.m., and I.R.S. <br /> regulations define commissioner stipends as compensation. As 7:00 p.m. is the start <br /> time for Youth Commission meetings, §2.29.030 is proposed to be amended to clarify <br /> these limitations. <br /> §2.38.080 Housing Commission Quorum — While the Housing Commission's <br /> membership previously was reduced from seven to five members, the number of <br /> commissioners constituting a quorum was not changed. This amendment would set a <br /> quorum as three of five members. <br /> §2.48.050 Selection of professional services firms - California law provides cities with <br /> some flexibility in selecting qualified architects, engineers, surveyors, construction <br /> managers, and other professional firms (in contrast with low bid requirements for public <br /> works projects). (See Government Code §4526.) The existing selection procedures in <br /> Chapter 2.48 of the Municipal Code were adopted in 1991, amended in 1992, and are <br /> proposed to be updated to reflect current law. This includes not requiring in every <br /> instance of hiring a firm that three firms always be interviewed. <br /> §5.08.020 Business License for Non-Profit Promoter Events -With local non-profits <br /> utilizing new events for fundraising which involve commercial services by third parties, <br /> §5.08.020 of the Municipal Code is proposed to be amended to recognize this category <br /> of non-profits acting as a `promoter' and using services of for-profit companies. <br /> Currently, when a promoter brings multiple for-profit vendors to sell goods or food at an <br /> event, either each vendor needs to obtain a business license, or the commercial <br /> promoter needs to get a $300 promoter business license. The Municipal Code is <br /> proposed to be amended to create a non-profit promoter business license at $150. This <br /> amount is less than a for-profit event, and gives the option to eliminate the requirement <br /> that each individual vendor at such non-profit event obtain its own business license. <br /> Another administrative change to this code section provides for all promoters to pay <br /> fees 30 days in advance, rather than 90 days. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.