My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
020414
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:00:24 PM
Creation date
1/30/2014 3:38:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
7
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WORKPLAN <br /> Deliverables:One Electronic copy of the Summary of Comments/Meeting <br /> Minutes <br /> Subtask 8.4- FCS will prepare the Administrative Draft EIR and submit c:>pies to the City <br /> Administrative Draft review,which will include the following: <br /> Environmental Impact <br /> Report Project Description. One of the first key actions of the FIR process will be <br /> to finalize a project description for the project and project al_ernatives. We <br /> will work with the City to prepare a description that articulates the project's <br /> overall objectives based on the City's direction. FCS will expand the project <br /> description prepared for the NOP to create a complete description of the <br /> Plan that reflects comments received on the NOP and input provided at Task <br /> Force meetings and other public workshops. Intended uses of the FIR(as <br /> required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15124(d))will be provided,including a <br /> list of responsible and other agencies expected to use the FAR in decision <br /> making,and a list of approvals for which the EIR will be used. <br /> Establishment of Thresholds of Significance. ICS will utilize the City's <br /> environmental thresholds;accordingly,we will formulate a hybrid,or <br /> combined,list based on Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines and any <br /> particular thresholds that pertain to the Specific Plan. In addition to the <br /> general standards of significance identified in the CEQA Guidelines,there <br /> are established thresholds applicable to this project,including but not limited <br /> to: <br /> • Air quality(Bay Area Air Quality Management District's [BAAQMD]) <br /> thresholds for toxic area contaminants and construction and operations <br /> emissions,as well as its per capita Green House Gas (C HG) thresholds <br /> (although the 2011 guidelines were recently rescinded,we recommend <br /> using them for screening purposes to determine level of impact) <br /> • Biological resources(California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG], <br /> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS],United States Army Corps of <br /> Engineers [USACE]) <br /> • Cultural resources (State Historic Preservation Office [SHPO]) <br /> • Hazardous materials <br /> • Hydrology and water quality(Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> [RWQCBl) <br /> • Land use(City's General Plan) <br /> • Noise(City Ordinance) <br /> • Traffic (City and Caltrans) <br /> • Water Supply Assessment <br /> Effects Identified as Potentially Significant. FCS will conduct an <br /> environmental analysis of the proposed project to include the documentation <br /> of baseline conditions,project and cumulative impact evaluations,and <br /> mitigation measures for each environmental issue. FCS will review all <br /> available studies and data prepared by others for CEQA adequacy. The <br /> following list of discussions is critical to the EIR. <br /> GATES <br /> *AssouAT(s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.