My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
020414
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:00:10 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 3:55:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P13-2458, Downtown Revitalization District In-Lieu Parking Fee <br /> Environmental Checklist <br /> 5.17 RECREATION <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> Parks and recreational facilities are located throughout the City of Pleasanton, including <br /> the Downtown Area. The Downtown Specific Plan addresses mini-plazas and similar <br /> amenities. The underlying zoning map establishes where these amenities and/or <br /> improvements may be located, which are not a part of this PMC amendment. No <br /> physical changes, such as demolition, grading or construction, are proposed as part of <br /> the PMC text amendment. <br /> Standards of Significance <br /> For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the <br /> proposed project would: <br /> ■• Result in the failure to meet City standards for the provisions of parkland. <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant Less Than No <br /> Recreation Significant with Significant Impact <br /> Would the project: impact Mitigation Impact <br /> Incorporation <br /> a) Would the project increase the X <br /> use of existing neighborhood and <br /> regional parks or other recreational <br /> facilities such that substantial <br /> physical deterioration of the facility <br /> would occur or be accelerated? <br /> b) Does the project include X <br /> recreational facilities or require the <br /> construction or expansion of <br /> recreational facilities which might <br /> have an adverse physical effect on <br /> the environment? <br /> Discussion <br /> a.-b. No residential units are part of the PMC amendment and, therefore, the <br /> amendment will not result in the increased use of existing neighborhood or regional <br /> parks. The amendment does not include the construction, expansion or demolition of <br /> recreational facilities. The amendment is not anticipated to create any new or additional <br /> impacts which have not already been studied in the Pleasanton General Plan and <br /> Downtown Specific Plan EIRs. Therefore, these would be of no impact. <br /> 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.