My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
020414
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:00:10 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 3:55:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P13-2458, Downtown Revitalization District In-Lieu Parking Fee <br /> Environmental Checklist <br /> 5.11 GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> No physical changes, such as construction or demolition, are proposed as part of this <br /> project. <br /> Standards of Significance <br /> For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the <br /> proposed project would: <br /> • Result in a project being built that will either introduce geologic, soils, or seismic <br /> hazard by allowing the construction of the project on such a site without protection <br /> against those hazards. <br /> Less Than <br /> Geo loav and Soils Potentially Significant Less Than No <br /> Would the project: Significant with Significant Impact <br /> Impact Mitigation Impact <br /> _ incorporation <br /> a) Expose people or structures to <br /> potential substantial adverse <br /> effects, including the risk of loss, <br /> injury, or death involving: _ <br /> i) Rupture of a known earthquake <br /> fault, as delineated on the most <br /> recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake <br /> Fault Zoning Map issued by the <br /> State Geologist for the area or X <br /> based on other substantial evidence <br /> of a known fault? Refer to Division <br /> of Mines and Geology Special <br /> Publication 42. <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground failure, X <br /> including liquefaction? <br /> iv) Landslides? X <br /> b) Result in substantial soil erosion X <br /> or the loss of topsoil? <br /> c) Be located on a geologic unit or <br /> soil that is unstable, or that would <br /> become unstable as a result of the <br /> project, and potentially result in on- X <br /> or off-site landslide, lateral <br /> 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.