Laserfiche WebLink
However more recent data for the period ending June 30, 2012, illustrates that <br /> poor investment returns, coupled with changes in plan assumptions by PERS <br /> (e.g. discount rates and mortality rates) has resulted in the City's unfunded <br /> obligations increasing between $4.2 million (actuarial) and $22.140 million <br /> (market). This situation is not unique to Pleasanton, as the investment returns <br /> for fiscal year 2011/2012 were poor (only 1%) and PERS-initiated changes to <br /> discount rates and mortality rates affected all California Cities. These external <br /> impacts more than offset any meaningful savings resulting from the State's <br /> pension reform efforts and the City's local efforts to implement varies retirement <br /> tiers and requiring employees to pick-up their full EPMC. Arguably, however, the <br /> increases would have been greater without these state and local initiatives. <br /> 7. Community Services is an activity that is performed for the benefit of the public. <br /> This includes Human Services, Civic Arts, and Recreation. Also included are two <br /> enterprises — Pleasanton's Para-transit Program and the Callippe Preserve Golf <br /> Course. <br /> The primary metrics used to evaluate these functions are twofold: the number of <br /> enrollments or participants in various programs and the cost recovery for each <br /> program. In regards to enrollments, the City targets a 2% growth factor in each <br /> program annually. The quality of each program offered, convenient locations, <br /> and effective marketing have a direct impact on this target. In regards to cost <br /> recovery, the City targets an overall revenue model that limits General Fund <br /> subsidies to no more than 50% in the areas of Human Services, Civic Arts, and <br /> Recreation; no more than 70% in the Para-transit Enterprise; and 0% in the Golf <br /> Course Enterprise Operations. The City currently meets all targets for each <br /> functional area within Community Services. However, it is recommended these <br /> targets be carefully monitored and analyzed, and possibly reduced, in the coming <br /> years to limit reliance on the General Fund. This goal can be achieved through <br /> operational efficiencies, increased enrollments and participation in City programs, <br /> and modest fee adjustments in the future. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> The attached information is interesting and informative and provides perspective on how <br /> resources are allocated and measured organizationally. The survey results reflect the <br /> community's "qualitative" attitudes about City services, whereas as the performance <br /> metrics provide a "quantitative" look at the organization. These findings, when reviewed <br /> together, are useful in measuring performance and shaping the future strategic <br /> decisions of the City. In gathering the attached data, the focus of the City's executive <br /> team was to ensure the City is "measuring what matters" and that through constant <br /> reinforcement, the City's performance measurement program will work to improve the <br /> delivery of services and management of City resources. <br /> That said it is also important to note that each and every day, City of Pleasanton <br /> employees work to deliver exceptional value and quality of life to our residents and <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br />