13 - Laserfiche WebLink

DISCUSSION As indicated previously, the Schematic Plan includes those features and amenities approved on December 12, 2013 by the Parks and Recreation Commission and it unanimously supported the area's design and focus with the inclusion of a reservation of areas for the placement of art work at some time in the future, the additional trail access near Valley and Pleasanton Avenues, and the inclusion of interpretive signage related to the sites agricultural history. However, as part of its review, the Commission spent considerable time discussing the opportunities and constraints related to including a dog park in the Bernal Community Park Phase II, the Oak Woodland or some other area of the overall Bernal Property and this discussion led to the 3-2 vote approving the Schematic Plan. The dissenters (Balch and Streng) both indicated strong support for the Schematic Plan's design, but expressed an interest in seeing additional study related to including a dog park as part of the Oak Woodland or some other Bernal Property location as part of this current design/construction process. In addition, all commissioners expressed interest in pursuing an additional dog park at some future location and pointed to the draft Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan currently being prepared by RJM Design Group (Park Master Plan) that identifies a need for this facility. Finally, there was discussion regarding the fact that various City Commissions, including the Parks and Recreation Commission, recognized the need for a dog park on the Bernal Property as part of the 2005/06 Bernal Specific Plan process. The Commission's December 12 agenda report and the minutes from the December 12, 2013 meeting (Attachment 3) provide the background related to this matter and as such staff will not provide additional detail in this report. As part of the Commission's discussions staff raised, and continues to raise, two concerns regarding placement of a dog park on the Bernal Property: 1. While the Bernal Specific Plan does include one reference to "dog park" as a potential park and recreational use for the Bernal Property, its Illustrative Site Plan does not include a dog park and inclusion of one was not part of the ballot language that was approved by the voters as part of Measure P. Further, prior to finalizing the Illustrative Plan, and agreeing to place the Specific Plan on the ballot, the City Council removed the one dog park initially included as part of the Bernal Community Park. 2. The Potentially Permitted Uses for Sub-Area 3 (which is the Oak Woodland), included in the Bernal Specific Plan and the ballot language, includes "agriculture, open space, passive park and recreation facilities, and public utilities" and staff has maintained that a dog park does not meet that criteria or the portrayal of this Sub-Area as the "grand meadow." Based on the above, staff has taken a conservative interpretation of Measure P which states "further voter approval would be required before sub-areas, or permitted land uses within those sub-areas could be modified." and as a result, its position is that inclusion of a dog park in either the Oak Woodland or Bernal Community Park would require voter approval. Page 3 of 5