Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 14. Consider adoption of a resolution accepting the 2012/13FY Year-end Financial Report for the <br /> Capital Improvement Program Budget (CIP) and amend the 2012/13FY CIP Budget <br /> Finance Director Wagner presented the 2012/13FY Year-end Financial Report for the CIP Budget <br /> ending June 30, 2013, which is used to fund capital improvements including repair and maintenance of <br /> the city's water and sewer utilities, parks, streets and buildings. Unlike the Operating Budget, funds in <br /> the CIP Budget follow the project rather than the budget cycle and often carry forward to subsequent <br /> fiscal years until project completion. <br /> Ms. Wagner reviewed the Sewer Fund, which started with a fund balance of approximately $8.5 million. <br /> Revenues totaled $3.36 million, which is comprised of about $160,000 in sewer connection fees and a <br /> transfer of $1.2 million from the operating budget, and exceeded projections by nearly $44,000. <br /> Expenditures, which were budgeted at $7.8 million, totaled only a little over $500,000 due to <br /> outstanding projects which is quite typical of a CIP. Staff is requesting budget adjustments to account <br /> for a decrease in expenditures related to the closing out of the Utility Billing Software project, an <br /> increase in the projection of city staff time spent on sewer replacement projects, and budget carryovers <br /> of $7.2 million. Of note is the Sanitary Sewer Pump Project and Upgrade of S-6, which was completed <br /> and approved by the Council in July. Staff was able to save about $1 million allocated to the project that <br /> will go to the fund balance and be available for appropriation towards new projects in the 2013/14 FY. <br /> Councilmember Pentin asked whether savings such as this are restricted to the Sewer Fund CIP or can <br /> be appropriated to something like a streets project. <br /> Ms. Wagner explained that the revenues are from rate payer monies and therefore must be spent on <br /> sewer functions. <br /> Ms. Wagner continued her review of the Sewer Fund. She explained that while the Comprehensive <br /> Annual Financial Report will show an ending fund balance of $9.3 million, the $7.2 million in project <br /> carryovers leaves an unencumbered or adjusted fund balance of slightly over $2 million. Taking the $1 <br /> million savings on the S-6 project into account, the 2013/14 FY will really begin with a balance of $3 <br /> million. She noted that the city's current sewer connection fees of$500 per home, compared to $14,000 <br /> for DSRSD, are relatively low and will need to be increased in order to work towards an adjusted fund <br /> balance somewhere between $10 million and $20 million. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked how that recommendation was established. <br /> Ms. Wagner assured her there is a methodology which takes into account the infrastructure value of <br /> nearly $500 million as well as critical repair and replacement costs. <br /> Ms. Wagner reviewed the Water Fund, which began the year with a fund balance of $13.3 million. <br /> Connection fee revenues totaled $526,000, approximately $100,000 more than projected. As with <br /> sewer connection fees, the city's average fee of $1,500 is significantly lower than the $30,000 charged <br /> by Zone 7 and staff will be coming forward with a recommendation to increase fees. Both revenues and <br /> transfers in exceeded expectations due to the PG&E solar rebate, water connection fees, Recycled <br /> Water Grant subsidy and recycled water revenues. Expenditures, budgeted at $3.4 million, totaled only <br /> about $1.5 million, again due to outstanding projects. Staff is requesting budget adjustments to account <br /> for reduced expenditures related to the Utility Billing Software and El Charro Road Improvement <br /> projects, several small increases in project budgets and expenditures, and $1.9 million in project <br /> carryovers. If approved, the adjusted net fund balance totals almost $13 million which is much more in <br /> line with the recommended CIP fund balance than in the Sewer Fund. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 6 December 3, 2013 <br />