Laserfiche WebLink
In its discussion of drafting the new standard, the Task Force felt that there is a point when the <br /> lot is too narrow to reasonably locate a detached garage in the back of the lot and retain enough <br /> space for the construction of the home while meeting the City's setback requirements. The Task <br /> Force discussed various lot widths to use as the cutoff when a detached garage would be <br /> required (e.g., 45 ft., 50 ft., 60 ft., etc.) and ultimately selected a lot width of greater than 60 ft. <br /> The Task Force felt that a lot narrower than this would not allow one to build a house of <br /> reasonable width while also meeting the setback requirements. Exception language was also <br /> included to address a physical constraint, such as a heritage-sized tree, that prevented someone <br /> from installing a driveway on the side of the house. <br /> Below is the Task Force's recommended policy: <br /> When a lot exceeds 60 feet in width, detached garages are required and shall be located to the rear of <br /> the site. Exceptions can be granted due to a physical constraint that prevents compliance such as an <br /> existing heritage-sized tree. <br /> The Downtown Design Guidelines were modified to include the same language. Staff discusses <br /> a possible change to the Task Force's recommendation in the Discussion section below. <br /> Clarification to Existing Sections <br /> Because the new demolition and building design sections that were added only address <br /> residential structures, the existing sections which had originally addressed all structures (both <br /> residential and non-residential) needed to be modified to only address non-residential structures <br /> (see policy Nos. 3 and 5 on page 8 of Exhibit.A for the recommended changes). <br /> Downtown Design Guidelines Amendments <br /> As noted above, the Guidelines were amended to address new building design, compatibility of <br /> mass and bulk, and garage location. Other amendments were made to discourage the use of <br /> metal roofs (metal shingles that resemble shake or tile with a dull finish may be approved) and <br /> to discourage the replacement of wooden windows (replacement would be allowed if the <br /> replacement windows match the original windows regarding operation, profile, height, width, <br /> and glazing pattern). Please see Exhibit B for all of the recommended changes. <br /> Municipal Code Amendments <br /> Story Poles <br /> Story poles are a three-dimensional, full-scale silhouette that outline the location, bulk, and mass <br /> that a proposed structure will occupy on a site. Usually only the main wall planes and roof <br /> ridges are depicted. Story poles are usually constructed with wood 2x4s or PVC tubing and can <br /> include bright orange mesh on top to enhance visibility. The use of story poles has been <br /> discussed by the Planning Commission in the past, generally when there are concerns with a <br /> proposed structure's height, size, setbacks, etc. The City doesn't currently have any authority to <br /> require story poles and, when staff feels they are necessary, staff tries to convince applicants to <br /> P13-2446/P13-4447/P13-4448 Page - 8- November 13, 2013 <br />