My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
121713
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2013 1:21:52 PM
Creation date
12/9/2013 12:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Downtown Design Guidelines Amendments <br /> To be consistent with the Specific Plan, the Guidelines governing residential design <br /> were amended to address new building design, mass and bulk, and garage location. <br /> Other amendments were made to discourage the use of metal roofs (metal shingles that <br /> resemble shake or tile with a dull finish may be approved) and to discourage the <br /> replacement of wooden windows (replacement would be allowed if the replacement <br /> windows match the original windows regarding operation, profile, height, width, and <br /> glazing pattern). Please see Attachment 3 for all of the recommended changes. <br /> Municipal Code Amendments <br /> • Story Poles: Story poles (examples shown below) are not currently addressed by <br /> the Municipal Code. The Task Force felt that story poles are a useful tool to ensure <br /> the surrounding neighbors are aware of what a proposed home or addition would <br /> look like in terms of its height and mass before a decision is made by the City. A <br /> similar sentiment was also stated by Councilmember Brown at the Council check-in. <br /> The draft amendment would allow the City to require an applicant to install story <br /> poles for a new single-family home or two-story addition to a single-family home. <br /> vFUi ahl llryIq' i/dpi l/� �%rlpq i , , iii l ,^4 <br /> Zla'r i <br /> • Demolition by Neglect: An existing Municipal Code section only addresses <br /> demolition by neglect for non-single-family homes in the Downtown Revitalization <br /> District, which is a smaller area than the Downtown Specific Plan Area. The draft <br /> amendment would apply to all structures within the Downtown Specific Plan Area, <br /> including single-family homes. <br /> General Plan Amendments <br /> The General Plan currently states in two locations that the City will adopt a historic <br /> preservation ordinance. Based on the City Council's prior direction that it did not wish to <br /> create a historic preservation ordinance, but instead wanted the existing Downtown <br /> historic preservation policies, guidelines, and processes be re-evaluated, these two <br /> sections of the General Plan would be deleted. <br /> Historic Context Statement <br /> The draft Pleasanton Downtown Historic Context Statement prepared for the Task <br /> Force in 2012 by Architectural Resources Group, Inc. (Exhibit G of Attachment 9) <br /> identifies primary themes in the history of Pleasanton and connects those themes to the <br /> built environment by identifying property types associated with each theme. It provides <br /> a common resource document for future determinations of eligibility for listing on the <br /> California Register. <br /> Page 5 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.