My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
121713
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2013 1:21:52 PM
Creation date
12/9/2013 12:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> Based on the direction it received from the City Council check-in and public feedback <br /> received at the various public meetings, the Task Force developed and is <br /> recommending amendments to the General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan, Downtown <br /> Design Guidelines, and Pleasanton Municipal Code to modify the existing Downtown <br /> historic preservation policies and design guidelines, implement story pole requirements, <br /> and address demolition by neglect. All of the amendments would be limited to the <br /> Downtown Specific Plan Area (shown in Exhibit K of Attachment 9). Highlights of the <br /> proposed amendments are summarized below and are described in more detail in the <br /> attached Planning Commission staff report. <br /> Downtown Specific Plan Amendments <br /> • Local Standards: The existing criteria that are used for determining if a residential <br /> structure is considered a historic resource and protected from demolition would be <br /> modified: <br /> Current: At least 50 years old and determined to be eligible for the CA Register. <br /> Proposed: Built before 1942 and determined to be eligible for the CA Register <br /> using the Pleasanton Downtown Historic Context Statement as a resource <br /> document. <br /> • Commercial Properties: The new historic preservation policies would not be <br /> applicable to commercially-zoned properties, including residences in commercial or <br /> office zoning districts. A few existing Specific Plan policies had to be slightly <br /> modified to clarify that they only apply to non-residential properties. <br /> • Demolition Definition: A definition of demolition for residential structures was <br /> created: <br /> Demolition of a residential building for purposes of historic preservation shall be <br /> defined as the removal of the front facade or the most visible facade from the street, <br /> including changes to the roof and roof line. The front or most visible facade shall be <br /> considered the forward most ten feet of the structure. If the portion(s) of a building <br /> that is(are) required to remain as described above are later determined by the <br /> Director of Community Development to be unusable (e.g., due to dry rot, termite <br /> damage, etc.), then said portion(s) may be removed and reconstructed provided the <br /> new exterior construction matches the original in material, composition, design, <br /> color, texture, shape, and dimensions. <br /> • New Residential Building Design: The current policy states "new building design <br /> should draw upon the primary exterior features of Downtown's traditional design <br /> character in terms of architectural style..." and "...the design of new/replacement <br /> buildings should not represent a significant departure from the existing neighborhood <br /> character." In order to clearly inform property owners and applicants what <br /> residential architectural styles are acceptable Downtown, the policy would be <br /> Page 3 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.