My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN101513
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
CCMIN101513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2013 1:11:38 PM
Creation date
11/7/2013 1:11:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to evaluate a range of alternatives with the varied features discussed by the task force, any of which <br /> can ultimately be selected or amended to something lesser than what was studied. <br /> Following completion of the EIR, there will be additional opportunities for public hearings and plan <br /> evolution before the regular public review process through the Planning Commission and City Council. <br /> While staff and consultants are working to prepare the EIR, the task force will begin to tackle the issues <br /> of design guidelines and financing. One of the guiding principles defined by the Council is that any new <br /> development on the east side must be able to pay for itself in terms of infrastructure, all of which is <br /> influenced by the level, type and pacing of development. The real challenge will be to balance the <br /> demands of RHNA against growth constraints while still allowing for development that can adequately <br /> finance its own infrastructure. He stressed again that the term "preferred plan" does not indicate an <br /> actual preference, nor should it suggest that staff or the Council are anywhere close in understanding <br /> what the final product will be. He anticipated the draft EIR would be complete in the first quarter of <br /> 2012. <br /> Mayor Thorne restated the purpose of tonight's hearing for the benefit of the public, noting that some of <br /> the questions he and the Council have received indicate that it is not well understood. He stressed that <br /> what is referred to as a "preferred plan" does not necessarily indicate a plan that is preferred by this <br /> Council. The community, task force, Planning Commission and Council will use the information that <br /> comes out of the EIR to develop an option that may contain more or less housing units than are <br /> identified in the preferred or base plan, provided it is a scenario that was evaluated through the EIR. <br /> Mr. Dolan confirmed. He noted that the Planning Commission's recommendation did include one <br /> additional alternative that would be described shortly. The Commission made clear in its motion that <br /> several members are concerned about the number of residential units that will ultimately be included in <br /> the plan, but that they also do not wish to approve something that is economically realistic. The <br /> Commission would like to conduct additional financial feasibility analysis as more information about <br /> infrastructure costs is available, with the focus being on approving something that is no larger than it <br /> needs to be to pay for itself and provide some reasonable return for the developers. He also noted that <br /> staff only recently received more detailed information regarding the school district's request, which is a <br /> very substantial value and has not until now been included in any sort of financial analysis. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio agreed that there seems to be a poor understanding of the goals of the EIR. <br /> She asked and Mr. Dolan confirmed that it is important to study a broad enough range of scenarios to <br /> include all reasonable eventualities so that the EIR does not have to be revised later at additional cost. <br /> She too stressed that purpose of this is to gather enough information to make the best possible <br /> decision for this community and not to make recommendations on any one alternative over the other. <br /> Wayne Rasmussen, Rasmussen Planning, introduced the EIR preferred plan and plan alternatives, <br /> which are more or less refinements of what was presented to the Council earlier this year. <br /> Preferred Plan <br /> This alternative proposes 1,759 total housing units, 65% of which would be single-family and 35% of <br /> which would be multi-family residential units, over a plan area of 1,110 acres. Multi-family housing is <br /> dispersed throughout two primary areas which feather out to the lowest density of 4 units per acre at <br /> the edges. The El Charro Road extension would come straight down from the north before curving over <br /> to connect at the driveway entry to the Shadow Cliffs parking lot. Bush Road would extend all the way <br /> through to El Charro. This alternative also includes a proposed extension from Boulder Street at Valley <br /> Avenue travelling through the plan area. <br /> All plan alternatives include a 32-acre open space facility near the Chain of Lakes. The task force feels <br /> this is an excellent opportunity to, in working with Zone 7, further expand the use of the park in terms of <br /> trails and vistas by securing easements into the adjacent Zone 7 area. All plans also include a small <br /> retail neighborhood facility and village green across from the park. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 13 October 15,2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.