Laserfiche WebLink
page 2 <br /> ALTERNATIVE 3 <br /> 0-30%AMI 31-50%AMI 51-80%AMI <br /> BMR Need Generated by: <br /> Market Rate Residential 145 30 46 69 <br /> Retail 59 13 19 27 <br /> Office 277 46 83 148 <br /> Industrial Flex 772 191 260 352 <br /> Total BMR need 1253 280 408 596 <br /> Potential BMR units 375 <br /> BMR unit deficit 878 <br /> ALTERNATIVE 4 <br /> 0-30%AMI 31-50%AMI 51-80%AMI <br /> BMR Need Generated by: <br /> Market Rate Residential 134 30 42 62 <br /> Retail 59 13 19 27 <br /> Office 277 46 83 148 <br /> Industrial Flex 772 191 260 352 <br /> Total BMR need 1242 319 452 577 <br /> Potential BMR units 196 <br /> BMR unit deficit 1046 <br /> While the Task Force may not wish to accommodate a majority of Pleasanton's future housing needs in the plan, <br /> neither should East Pleasanton development dramatically increase the entire community's need/obligation to <br /> provide affordable workforce housing in the future. The Task Force should consider adjusting the plan. Some <br /> suggestions are: <br /> • Remove all Office and Industrial Flex from the alternatives. <br /> • Reconsider adjustment of the Airport Protection Area to allow FOR development across from the Outlet <br /> Stores at the north end of the property.This is an excellent location for affordable workforce housing,close <br /> to both jobs and transit. <br /> • Increase the amount of higher density development slightly. <br /> If the area cannot be feasible developed without including commercial acreage(beyond neighborhood retail,which <br /> seems essential for good planning)then it would be better not to develop the area at all. It seems pointless to meet <br /> Pleasanton's need for workforce housing with a plan that creates even more need. <br /> Thank you for your consideration <br /> Sincerely, <br /> dikes t, Of2/2nza <br /> Citizens for a Caring Community <br />