Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br /> of 4 units per acre, which are located at the entry next to the existing residences and <br /> wraps around and basically takes up a good portion of the northern residential, with the <br /> southern portion including 8 units per acre and the 11 unit per acre in the higher density <br /> area. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen then presented Option 5B, which is similar to the Preferred Plan in <br /> many ways with the exception that it proposes a 50/50 mix of single-family to <br /> multi-family for the 1,759 units. He indicated that the main difference between this and <br /> the Preferred Plan is that this Plan calls for more single-family residential and less <br /> multi-family so it frees up quite a bit of acreage for the low density 4 units per acre. <br /> Finally, Mr. Rasmussen presented Option 6, which is the most intensive of all the <br /> Options, proposing 2,279 units and a mix of 58-percent single-family and 42-percent <br /> multi-family. He indicated that is similar to the Plan presented to the Commission a few <br /> months ago, and its distinguishing characteristics are that it has all the multi-family <br /> centered on the spine and along the southern side of Busch Road, with the single-family <br /> bringing in a lot more 11 units per acre and a limited amount of 8 units per acre and 4 <br /> units per acre at the entry and next to the existing residents. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that he would like to have some concluding comments and talk about <br /> the Preferred Plan and a little bit more summary of what really drove the thinking of the <br /> Task Force. He indicated that first of all, the Task Force spent a lot of time talking about <br /> the total number of units, with the Options having a range of alternatives from 1,000 up <br /> to 2,279. He noted that the Preferred Plan was the Alternative that, based on the <br /> available information to date, was the one that was sort of in the middle and that early <br /> indications showed was going to be financially feasible. He further noted that there is <br /> enough value created here with these land uses to pay for all the things that need to be <br /> paid for. He indicated that at this time, not all the information are available that may <br /> eventually be, and probably not all the costs are in either. He added that there are a <br /> few inputs that have not really been considered since the Task Force did a lot of this <br /> work, including some of the "Asks" from the School District, which made some decisions <br /> about land and buildings at its most recent meeting but which have not really been <br /> worked through. He noted that there are also costs, which very, very recently includes <br /> a number for contribution to the County Stanley Boulevard Project, where the County <br /> says that the City has been assuming a smaller number than the County was expecting, <br /> and so the City needs to work that through the financial process as well. He pointed out <br /> that he is bringing this out now because these things are going to continue to evolve <br /> and not all the inputs are included yet. <br /> Mr. Dolan continued that the next thing that the Task Force considered that was very <br /> important to the Task Force members and something they really valued a lot was that <br /> they want this part of town to look like the rest of the town in terms of the percentage of <br /> single-family versus higher density. He indicated that staff had presented that to the <br /> Commission earlier and has also talked about it with the City Council; and even though <br /> the Council said that it would consider something up to 50 percent, the Task Force, after <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/25/2013 Page 6 of 28 <br />