Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Sowell stated that another thing that came up that he had not heard before was a <br /> presentation by the gentleman that was the owner or spokesperson for Kiewit who <br /> brought some figures regarding densities that were not reflected in any of the four <br /> existing Alternatives, and which he is calling Alternative 5, although it is not anything <br /> official. He recalled that the speaker brought up the possibility of densities in the order <br /> of 6 to 12 units along with the 23 and 30 units mix instead of the 3, 4, and 11 mixes that <br /> were part of Alternatives 1, 2, 3 and 4. He asked the Commission to look at that as well <br /> and factor that into its thought process. He noted that if there are 5, 6, 8, 10 or 12 units <br /> per acre rather than just 3 units, there would be a sea of 3 units per acre and then <br /> towers of 23 and 30 units. He indicated that it does not need to be like that, and maybe <br /> that kind of variability would be in order. He stated that maybe an Alternative 5 or 6 <br /> would make a little more sense, or tweak 1 and 2 to change the 4's and 3's to 6's and <br /> 8's and the 8's to 10's or 12's. He noted that Commissioner Pearce ran some numbers, <br /> and pointed out that this has the effect of giving everybody a little more wiggle room, not <br /> only in this particular part of town but in the rest of town. <br /> Mr. Sowell stated that a third thing he wanted to bring up, which he mentioned at the <br /> Task Force meeting, is that at the very beginning of the Task Force process, the City <br /> Council did an end-run around the Task Force by ruling out in the top corner, which is <br /> just inside the Airport Protection Area, the existence of any housing and instead putting <br /> campus office in there. He noted that this goes back to the industrial/commercial use in <br /> the southeast corner and that it may not make sense to have that zoned that way as <br /> well. <br /> Mary Switzer stated that she has lived in town for 41 years and has watched it grow. <br /> She indicated that her biggest concern with respect to East Pleasanton is the traffic. <br /> She questioned what the City is going to do about the traffic going down Stanley <br /> Boulevard and if Busch Road and Boulder Street will be extended. She noted that right <br /> now, when the freeway gets balled up, the people do an end-run around Stanley <br /> Boulevard, down First Street or Isabel Avenue and cuts through to 1-84. She expressed <br /> concern that there is the freeway in and out traffic, and the City is talking about some <br /> pretty high densities. She added that putting in apartments means a lot of cars in a <br /> small area, and all those cars have to get to the grocery store, to school, and to the <br /> Downtown. She stated that she also heard that there is going to be a couple of hundred <br /> apartment units on the corner where Bernal Avenue cuts across Stanley Boulevard, and <br /> if that is true, the resulting traffic should be considered. <br /> John Jay stated that he lives in southeast Pleasanton and moved here for the character <br /> of the City. He indicated that he loved the City back then and was concerned about the <br /> direction that it is headed toward today. He stated that the biggest concern that he has <br /> is the possibility of crime. He noted that he has been a prosecutor for 35 years, tried <br /> murder cases for 15 years and has run offices for about 11 years. He added that he <br /> sees patterns, and, unfortunately, one of those patterns is the relationship between <br /> low-income housing and crime. He inquired if, at this point, it is beyond requesting <br /> some sort of Environmental Impact Report or Economic Impact Report when <br /> low-income housing is interjected in other areas. He stated that he heard the <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 8 of 13 <br />